Re: SingleVersionForSavesBySameUserWithinHour implemented?

2009-04-09 Thread Bob Paige
Dirk, I think you have focused in on what the real requirement is here: don't create a new version if the change is minor. Previously in this thread we have assumed either that the user should know when not to create a new version, or that the amount of time that passed between creating changes

Re: SingleVersionForSavesBySameUserWithinHour implemented?

2009-04-08 Thread Harry Metske
fully agreed ! 2009/4/8 Janne Jalkanen janne.jalka...@iki.fi let's then keep the discussions there, another option might be to have one save button, but with an additional dont make new version check-box, whose setting is kept in the cookie ? I fear that that is a bit too confusing

Re: SingleVersionForSavesBySameUserWithinHour implemented?

2009-04-08 Thread Bob Paige
Good points. It seems to me we have two major audiences: geeky and non-geeky. The geeky would probably understand versioning and appreciate the desire to reduce intermediate versions. They would probably not be put off by an extra button or checkbox. The non-geeky would prefer the click here to

SingleVersionForSavesBySameUserWithinHour implemented?

2009-04-07 Thread Louis . Masters
Was SingleVersionForSavesBySameUserWithinHour ever implemented? Thanks, Lou ~~ LOG-NET, Inc. The Logistics Network Management System ~~ 230 Half Mile Road Third Floor Red Bank, NJ 07701 PH: 732-758-6800 FAX: 732-747-7497

Re: SingleVersionForSavesBySameUserWithinHour implemented?

2009-04-07 Thread Harry Metske
nope, is there a JIRA issue for this ? 2009/4/7 louis.mast...@log-net.com Was SingleVersionForSavesBySameUserWithinHour ever implemented? Thanks, Lou ~~ LOG-NET, Inc. The Logistics Network Management System ~~ 230 Half

Re: SingleVersionForSavesBySameUserWithinHour implemented?

2009-04-07 Thread Louis . Masters
I only see this page: http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/IdeaSingleVersionForSavesBySameUserWithinHour Harry Metske harry.met...@gmail.com wrote on 04/07/2009 12:05:15 PM: nope, is there a JIRA issue for this ? 2009/4/7 louis.mast...@log-net.com Was SingleVersionForSavesBySameUserWithinHour

Re: SingleVersionForSavesBySameUserWithinHour implemented?

2009-04-07 Thread Bob Paige
I found that page also. Before I found JSPWiki I was looking at several other options. One (maybe TWiki? I forget) had what I see as a better solution than those proposed on the referenced JSPWiki page; instead of setting a timeout, etc, you have two save buttons. One creates a new version, and

Re: SingleVersionForSavesBySameUserWithinHour implemented?

2009-04-07 Thread Harry Metske
I also prefer this option (2 buttons). Janne,Andrew,Dirk: this looks a good improvement to me, how does this fit in JCR ? (same semantics ?) Any caveats ? Do we need a JIRA issue here ? Harry 2009/4/7 Bob Paige bobpa...@gmail.com I found that page also. Before I found JSPWiki I was looking

Re: SingleVersionForSavesBySameUserWithinHour implemented?

2009-04-07 Thread Louis . Masters
Can we make this configurable via properties? I have a site that I need to maintain versioning so I would not allow the second button there. Thanks, Lou Harry Metske harry.met...@gmail.com wrote on 04/07/2009 12:31:03 PM: I also prefer this option (2 buttons). Janne,Andrew,Dirk: this

Re: SingleVersionForSavesBySameUserWithinHour implemented?

2009-04-07 Thread Janne Jalkanen
Having spent the last few years teaching TWiki to people, I can surely say that the two buttons are bloody confusing to most people. Must vote strong -1 on that idea. Implementing it would mean removing the previous version and then adding a new one. Not impossible with JCR either.

Re: SingleVersionForSavesBySameUserWithinHour implemented?

2009-04-07 Thread Dirk Frederickx
I used to have a kind of 'hacked' JSPWiki version as described in http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/VersionOverwrite. It allowed the user to overwrite the same version in very specific conditions : 1) The user must be logged in. (authenticated) Anonymous or asserted users can not overwrite