On 9 March 2016 at 06:51, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> We're starting to think about the next development cycle, and gathering
> priorities and requests from users of Juju. I'm writing to outline some
> current topics and also to invite requests or thoughts on relative
On 1 April 2016 at 20:50, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> On 19/03/16 01:02, Stuart Bishop wrote:
>> On 9 March 2016 at 10:51, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
>>
>>> Operational concerns
>> I still want 'juju-wait' as a supported, builtin command rather than
>> as a fragile
ator
> Liferay, Inc.
> Enterprise. Open Source. For life.
>
> From: Mark Shuttleworth <m...@ubuntu.com>
>
>> Date: Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 6:52 PM
>> Subject: Planning for Juju 2.2 (16.10 timeframe)
>> To: juju <j...@lists.ubuntu.com>, juju-dev@lists.ubunt
On 16 March 2016 at 12:31, Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks
>>
>> We're starting to think about the next development cycle, and gathering
>> priorities and requests from users of Juju. I'm
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> We're starting to think about the next development cycle, and gathering
> priorities and requests from users of Juju. I'm writing to outline some
> current topics and also to invite requests or thoughts on
On 16 March 2016 at 15:04, Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
> Relations have associated config schemas that can be set by the user
> creating the relation. I.e. I could run one autoscaling service and
> associate with relation config for autoscale options to the relation with a
> given
On 9 March 2016 at 10:51, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> Operational concerns
I still want 'juju-wait' as a supported, builtin command rather than
as a fragile plugin I maintain and as code embedded in Amulet that the
ecosystem team maintain. A thoughtless change to Juju's status
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:53 AM Jacek Nykis
wrote:
> On 08/03/16 23:51, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> > *Storage*
> >
> > * shared filesystems (NFS, GlusterFS, CephFS, LXD bind-mounts)
> > * object storage abstraction (probably just mapping to S3-compatible
> APIS)
> >
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Tom Barber wrote:
> c) upload files with actions. Currently for some things I need to pass in
> some files then trigger an action on the unit upon that file. It would be
> good to say path=/tmp/myfile.xyz and have the action upload that