On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Kapil Thangavelu
kapil.thangav...@canonical.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 5:04 PM, William Reade
william.re...@canonical.com wrote:
We're not changing any semantics; apart from anything else,
relation-broken does not depend on any remote unit.
its
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 5:14 AM, Andrew Wilkins
andrew.wilk...@canonical.com wrote:
If that's the case, why do we not just require charms to implement an
address-changed hook to update the relation setting then?
That way we don't break existing proxy charms, but other charms won't be
fixed
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 6:44 AM, William Reade william.re...@canonical.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 5:14 AM, Andrew Wilkins
andrew.wilk...@canonical.com wrote:
If that's the case, why do we not just require charms to implement an
address-changed hook to update the relation setting
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:29 PM, John Meinel j...@arbash-meinel.com wrote:
...
In a nutshell:
- There will be a new hook, relation-address-changed, and a new tool
called address-get.
This seems less than ideal, we already have standards ways of getting
this data and being notified of
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Andrew Wilkins
andrew.wilk...@canonical.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:29 PM, John Meinel j...@arbash-meinel.com
wrote:
...
In a nutshell:
- There will be a new hook, relation-address-changed, and a new tool
called address-get.
This seems less
addresses are just keys in a unit relation data bag. relation-get is the
cli tool to retrieve either self or related units databag key/values (ie
for self's address in the rel $ relation-get $JUJU_UNIT_NAME
private-address). unit-get is used to retrieve the current iaas properties
of a unit.
my
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Kapil Thangavelu
kapil.thangav...@canonical.com wrote:
or another unit level change hook (unit-address-changed), again the
concerns are that we're changing the semantics of relation hooks to
something fundamentally different for this one case (every other
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Kapil Thangavelu
kapil.thangav...@canonical.com wrote:
addresses are just keys in a unit relation data bag. relation-get is the
cli tool to retrieve either self or related units databag key/values (ie
for self's address in the rel $ relation-get
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 5:21 PM, William Reade william.re...@canonical.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Kapil Thangavelu
kapil.thangav...@canonical.com wrote:
addresses are just keys in a unit relation data bag. relation-get is the
cli tool to retrieve either self or related
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Kapil Thangavelu
kapil.thangav...@canonical.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 5:21 PM, William Reade
william.re...@canonical.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Kapil Thangavelu
kapil.thangav...@canonical.com wrote:
addresses are just keys
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 5:21 AM, William Reade william.re...@canonical.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Kapil Thangavelu
kapil.thangav...@canonical.com wrote:
addresses are just keys in a unit relation data bag. relation-get is the
cli tool to retrieve either self or related
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:42 PM, William Reade william.re...@canonical.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Andrew Wilkins
andrew.wilk...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've started looking into fixing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1215579. The gist is, we
currently set
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Andrew Wilkins
andrew.wilk...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've started looking into fixing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1215579. The gist is, we
currently set private-address in relation settings when a unit joins, but
never update it.
I've
...
In a nutshell:
- There will be a new hook, relation-address-changed, and a new tool
called address-get.
This seems less than ideal, we already have standards ways of getting this
data and being notified of its change. introducing non-orthogonal ways of
doing the same lacks value
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:29 AM, John Meinel j...@arbash-meinel.com wrote:
...
In a nutshell:
- There will be a new hook, relation-address-changed, and a new tool
called address-get.
This seems less than ideal, we already have standards ways of getting
this data and being notified of
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Kapil Thangavelu
kapil.thangav...@canonical.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:29 AM, John Meinel j...@arbash-meinel.com
wrote:
...
In a nutshell:
- There will be a new hook, relation-address-changed, and a new tool
called address-get.
This
Well, given it is unit-get shouldn't it be more relation-get
private-address ?
The issue is *that* is give me the private-address for the other side of
this relation.
Which is not quite what you want.
And while I think it is true that many things won't be able to handle
binding to more than one ip
17 matches
Mail list logo
