Hello,
On Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2007, Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
I'm afraid I was already well into the process of setting up the SVN
when I read the helpful e-mails in this thread. :[
I have made a stab at setting up the SVN for OpenJUMP at the JPP, and
it *may* be ready for use.
I made a
Andreas,
If you could create the svndump file for me it would save some time. I
can handle the process from there.
I'm not sure how big the svndump file will be. Hopefully small enough
to e-mail? If not we can probably put it up on my comany FTP site.
Thanks for your help.
Landon
On 6/14/07,
mhm .. i guess the dump is as large as the sum written in the download
section: ca 120MB
Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
Andreas,
If you could create the svndump file for me it would save some time. I
can handle the process from there.
I'm not sure how big the svndump file will be. Hopefully small
Andreas Schmitz wrote:
Hi,
mhm .. i guess the dump is as large as the sum written in the download
section: ca 120MB
bzip2ed it's just 74MB ;-)
Best regards, Andreas
--
l a t / l o n GmbH
Aennchenstrasse 19 53177 Bonn, Germany
phone ++49 +228 18496-11 fax ++49 +228 1849629
Thanks Andreas.
I will see if I can use the file you created to perform the conversion
over my lunch break and after work today.
I appreciate your help with this.
The Sunburned Surveyor
On 6/14/07, Andreas Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Schmitz wrote:
Hi,
mhm .. i guess the
Thanks for the offer Geoff. We will see how the survey goes.
SS
On 6/13/07, Geoffrey G Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear SS
If the survey is widely contributed to, then I would expect we would get
a good view of what plugins are being used and thus could easily form
the basis for a
Thanks to Michaël for implementing the SkyJUMP rendering
optimizations. Thanks to his efforts, the nightly build of OJ now
gets identical redraw benchmark times with SkyJUMP. :-)
There is still one more area where I think improvements are needed.
SkyJUMP still opens tasks with many layers
Larry,
Number 1 sounds good.
Number 4 sounds really good.
Number 5 sounds good.
Number 6 sounds good.
I'm a little nervous about Number 2. It sounds like a really nifty
feature, but I am wondering if we will confuse the user by adding what
seems to be input/output to a context menu in the Layer
To Developers:
The Plugin Survey is now up and running - a small number of changes to
collect some more data so it can be used by both users and developers.
I will leave it up for a couple of months, or so, or until the rate of
responses falls away.
I would encourage developers to complete
I have responded to Jody Garnett's recent post on cooperation among
the members of the open source Java GIS community on my OpenJUMP blog.
Some of you might be interested in reading it since I touch on some
topics that we have discussed on this mailing list recently.
http://openjump.blogspot.com/
Hi,
I'd like to add one or two plugins in the Tools/Analysis menu :
- the first one will use a user-defined attribute to union all features
in a layer having the same attribute value (that's what is done by the
dissolve script send by Hisaji a few days ago).
- the second one (or maybe an option
11 matches
Mail list logo
