Hi Larry,
thanks for your effort, I think this new function would be a nice and
useful option for labeling!
I don't know if I am getting the problem correctly, but couldn't the
entries of the "vertical alignment"-combobox be changed to "above the
feature", "on the feature" and "below the
Hi Nils,
I agree with your analysis except that OJ has no explicit definition of
polygon (or any other geometry type) layers, so setting the default
intelligently does not seem practical. Of course, you could loop though all
of the features for the layer to determine if the layer contained
Thanks Stefan. I would appreciate feedback from others on how vertical
alignment for polygons affects their work, plugins, or tutorials. If
necessary, I can change the default so that it acts like it did before the
mod (for new layers). Unfortunately, (for existing layers) the default
setting
Hi, Larry
Thanks Stefan. I would appreciate feedback from others on how
vertical alignment for polygons affects their work, plugins, or
tutorials. If necessary, I can change the default so that it acts
like it did before the mod (for new layers). Unfortunately, (for
existing layers)
I made an experimental change to LabelStyle to allow vertical alignment to
work for polygons and not just points and lines. For maps with polygon
layers that are not space filling (i.e. buildings), the preferred label
position is outside of the polygon, and you would choose a vertical
alignment
is welcome, I would say.
thanks!
Larry Becker schrieb:
I made an experimental change to LabelStyle to allow vertical alignment
to work for polygons and not just points and lines. For maps with
polygon layers that are not space filling (i.e. buildings), the
preferred label position is
