Re: [j-nsp] arp from correct IP address

2020-01-26 Thread Baldur Norddahl
Yes subscriber management has a lot of small but important things that are not quite "done". Juniper should put on a task force to get all the bugs sorted out. Could be a great system if they allow it to be. For me the trouble with this is that without functioning ARP the customer becomes "MAC

Re: [j-nsp] arp from correct IP address

2020-01-26 Thread Chris Kawchuk
Ran into the same bug. $junos-preffered-source-address for an unnumbered for BNG functions does NOT return the "closest/must suitable address" based on the IP+Subnet that was given the subscriber... contrary to the BNG template doucmentation. It just defaults the actual loopback of the router.

Re: [j-nsp] Automation - The Skinny (Was: Re: ACX5448 & ACX710)

2020-01-26 Thread Robert Raszuk
Hi Adam, I would almost agree entirely with you except that there are two completely different reasons for automation. One as you described is related to service provisioning - here we have full agreement. The other one is actually of keeping your network running. Imagine router maintaining

Re: [j-nsp] Automation - The Skinny (Was: Re: ACX5448 & ACX710)

2020-01-26 Thread adamv0025
> Mark Tinka > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 2:32 PM > > On 24/Jan/20 12:10, Saku Ytti wrote: > > > In my opinion we do roughly the same thing, the same way in networks, > > with the same protocols since my start of career in 90s, very little > > has changed and you could drop competent neteng

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper support offline?

2020-01-26 Thread Christian Scholz
Everything works here again - without resetting. Looks like it’s recovering Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 26.01.2020 um 17:08 schrieb Ross Halliday > : > > Seems to be back albeit a bit rocky - I could not get in with my previous > password and had to reset. SRM and Downloads appear to

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper support offline?

2020-01-26 Thread Ross Halliday
Seems to be back albeit a bit rocky - I could not get in with my previous password and had to reset. SRM and Downloads appear to be functioning Ross -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp On Behalf Of Thomas Scott Sent: January 26, 2020 6:14 AM To: Nathan Ward Cc: Juniper NSP

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper support offline?

2020-01-26 Thread Thomas Scott
Just got off the phone with JTAC and was informed the website was down for "maintenance". We managed to open a case last night, but were unable to this morning... I'm hoping that the "issue" doesn't last too long.. Phone number I called was 1-888-314-5822. - Thomas Scott |

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper support offline?

2020-01-26 Thread Nathan Ward
Hi, The published number on the Juniper website - 0080025864737 doesn’t work, and the +1888 US number went to Juniper, but to voicemail. I’ve called the number Liam has posted here (same as above but with + rather than 00), which worked - the agent had told me that there was maintenance