[j-nsp] PR Site URL

Guys- where do you check juniper PRs like PR/396291 etc... Can anyone write me back with the URL pointing towards PR cases stie. Thanks BR/// Andrew _ Windows Live: Friends

[j-nsp] MX own interface packet drops

When you do a rapid ping to yourself on a MX box you see a small amout of packet loss. Just wana confirm if you are seeing the same at your end. n...@mx# run ping any-ge-xe-local-interface rapid count 9000 size 900 9000 packets transmitted, 8992 packets received, 0% packet loss

Re: [j-nsp] MTU Compression

This is interesting if you can compress MTU and thn decompress it. OTOH you can configure a GRE/IPIP tunnel over backbone for that particular customer and use whatever MTU you wana. Thx Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 09:59:20 +0100 From: humair.s@gmail.com To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

[j-nsp] DWDM 10Gig transmit power

I am trying to find out what is causing my link to go down either the transmit power or a receive power. Below are the parameters of link having a connectivity issue of DWDM transmission. The problem is sometimes it works and sometime it does not and transmission guys keep insisting that your

[j-nsp] 10G DWDM UPDOWN

I have a 10G circuit over DWDM which is flapping very frequently occasionally. DOWN to UP state takes 5 second most of the time, just wondering what could be causing this. Sep 22 21:47:46 T12 mib2d[2061]: SNMP_TRAP_LINK_DOWN: ifIndex 117, ifAdminStatus up(1), ifOperStatus down(2),

[j-nsp] routing updates between PFEs and Kernal

We started using MX-480 and I came to know that each DPC has four PFEs. Now a question comes to mind that how the chemistry of routing updates in between PFEs and RE(kernel) is being done. If kernel routes are being exported to PFEs, does it means that each PFE contains a full routing table?

Re: [j-nsp] routing updates between PFEs and Kernal

From: r...@e-gerbil.net To: go...@live.com CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] routing updates between PFEs and Kernal On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:00:11PM +0500, Good One wrote: We started using MX-480 and I came to know that each DPC has four PFEs. Now a question

[j-nsp] bla.bla.bla.0

I was just thinking about using bla.bla.bla.0/32 (as a loopback address) and bla.bla.bla.0/31 on some point to point interfaces. Not sure which one is ugly and not useable at the moment. But would love to hear from you guys...

Re: [j-nsp] routing updates between PFEs and Kernal

at 11:34:59PM +0500, Good One wrote: Thanks for an useful information, Richard. Well, a DPC has a 1G ram inside and if each PFE has a complete copy of the routing table (even the best route) and you are receiving a full feed of internet and a thousands of your own routes, then all

[j-nsp] TCP based RED profile on MX

just a quick one. can you configure red drop profile for tcp traffic only on MX-Boxes? There is a knob on T-Series so that you can define what protocol you want to pass through the red profile either tcp/udp but on MX i could not find that option so it seems if you configure a profile it will

Re: [j-nsp] TCP based RED profile on MX

-guidelines/cos-configuring-drop-profile-maps-for-schedulers.html Regards ./diogo -montagner On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Good One go...@live.com wrote: just a quick one. can you configure red drop profile for tcp traffic only on MX-Boxes? There is a knob on T-Series so that you can