Because of this I'd like to use a Lisp dialect to add scripting. Right
now, I'm looking mostly at SISC and Kawa.
I don't know if the author(s) of SISC are following this list--I don't
recall them speaking up or presenting SISC--an invitation to them
might be in order.
Patrick
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Randall R Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the application use classloaders in interesting ways that might
trip up the language implementation?
My application does not, but the fact that its deployed in a servlet
container might make the answer a de
Attila Szegedi schrieb:
On 2008.04.30., at 11:49, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
Rich Hickey schrieb:
On Apr 29, 5:36 pm, Jochen Theodorou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I think the answer is tags, as John Rose discussed here:
http://blogs.sun.com/jrose/entry/fixnums_in_the_vm
That, standard
On Apr 30, 2:06 am, Per Bothner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps a friendly merger might be possible?
I think peaceful coexistence is more likely. Clojure has certainly
ceded the backwards-compatibility ground.
There was a time (you may not remember) when I was considering either
On 4/30/08, Attila Szegedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008.04.30., at 11:49, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
Rich Hickey schrieb:
On Apr 29, 5:36 pm, Jochen Theodorou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I think the answer is tags, as John Rose discussed here:
Rich Hickey wrote:
On Apr 30, 2:06 am, Per Bothner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps a friendly merger might be possible?
I think peaceful coexistence is more likely. Clojure has certainly
ceded the backwards-compatibility ground.
There was a time (you may not remember) when I was
Hi,
So, I promised that I would write up a description of ioke, so here
goes. This is mostly tentative right now, since the implementation is
not at all finished, and I'm finding myself yak shaving all the time.
ioke is a language for the JVM. It takes influence mostly from Io,
Smalltalk,
On Tuesday 29 April 2008 14:07, Randall R Schulz wrote:
...
Thanks everyone for the feedback, especially for being made aware of
Clojure.
I'll be looking into these three languages (in alphabetic order, of
course):
- Clojure
- Kawa
- SISC
Randall Schulz
On Apr 30, 2008, at 6:37 AM, John Wilson wrote:
On 4/30/08, Attila Szegedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008.04.30., at 11:49, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
I don't see how this will help me in Groovy. We use the Java
types, so
there is no need to represent a 20 bit integer.
It doesn't help
On 2008.04.30., at 20:59, John Rose wrote:
On Apr 30, 2008, at 6:37 AM, John Wilson wrote:
I'm rather unsure about the value of making changes like this to the
JVM. The timescale from now to when they become useable is rather
long
(2-3 years to get into a released JVM then another 2-3
Jochen Theodorou wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter schrieb:
[...]
I see... maybe the JRuby problem is just very different from the Groovy
problem here
Well, not really...you box all arguments in arrays too, and you're
paying a cost for that. Whether that cost is measurable in the face of
Rodrigo B. de Oliveira wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Brian Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
projects now I can't imagine being that statically bound. My impression
is that C#/.NET has similar (if perhaps slightly lessened) restrictions.
I don't think .NET is any less dynamic
12 matches
Mail list logo
