On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Greg Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, if Groovy is pre-compiled, is the Groovy JAR still required at
deployment time?
Yes.
Thanks. What about this part?
I'm working under the assumption that it is possible to pre-compile
Groovy into bytecode.
I'm working under the assumption that it is possible to pre-
compile Groovy into bytecode.
If so, then the Groovy runtime theoretically shouldn't need to
perform class generation,
wouldn't need security privileges, and thus wouldn't require a
signed applet. Is this accurate?
Missed
On 2008.11.13., at 21:02, Greg Brown wrote:
I'm also interested in using JavaScript in an applet. I can't use the
version of Rhino that ships with Java 6 because Apple doesn't include
it (and Apple doesn't support Java 6 in applets yet anyways). Does
anyone know if it is possible to use
Trouble is, Rhino's code for interface implemention actually generates
bytecode; it doesn't go i.e. through java.lang.reflect.Proxy (its
codegen capabilities predate Java 1.3). So regardless of interpreted
mode, Rhino will need to have the ability to load generated code if
you're using
Is there a way to run Groovy so that it would not need to be signed?
Not as far as I know.
I guess it'd require a fair amount of work to allow that.
Just to make sure I understand - does this apply to interpreted Groovy
*and* Groovy that is compiled to bytecode, or just interpreted Groovy?
Greg Brown schrieb:
Is there a way to run Groovy so that it would not need to be signed?
Not as far as I know.
I guess it'd require a fair amount of work to allow that.
Just to make sure I understand - does this apply to interpreted Groovy
*and* Groovy that is compiled to bytecode, or just
Is there a way to run Groovy so that it would not need to be signed?
Not as far as I know.
I guess it'd require a fair amount of work to allow that.
Just to make sure I understand - does this apply to interpreted Groovy
*and* Groovy that is compiled to bytecode, or just interpreted Groovy?
Also, if Groovy is pre-compiled, is the Groovy JAR still required at
deployment time?
Yes.
Thanks. What about this part?
I'm working under the assumption that it is possible to pre-compile
Groovy into bytecode.
If so, then the Groovy runtime theoretically shouldn't need to perform
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Greg Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess we'd better move that discussion on the Groovy lists, since
it's perhaps too Groovy specific?
Agreed. What might be a more appropriate group?
The Groovy user mailing-list may be more appropriate, I guess.
But
Greg Brown wrote:
Is there a way to run Groovy so that it would not need to be signed?
I think this is the key question. The idea that apps can be written for the
Java Plugin using any JVM scripting language is very compelling; somewhat
less so if the code needs to be signed in order for
Patrick Wright a écrit :
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg Brown wrote:
Is there a way to run Groovy so that it would not need to be signed?
I think this is the key question. The idea that apps can be written for the
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Greg Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This sounds like a very cool feature. I've been trying to figure out
how I might build an applet in Groovy. Are you aware of any examples
that demonstrate this?
You can already build applets in Groovy, even without that
I guess *I'm* missing something. I haven't been able to find any
examples that show how to do this.
On Nov 10, 2008, at 4:30 PM, Guillaume Laforge wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Greg Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This sounds like a very cool feature. I've been trying to figure
The Grapplet module is a nice improved Groovy / Applet mix, for
instance: http://groovy.codehaus.org/Grapplet
But beyond this, there's perhaps not much documentation because Groovy
can be compiled to bytecode, and you can just bundle that bytecode in
normal JARs without much more complexity
Interesting. Just wondering - why does the JAR need to be signed?
I'll be more specific about what I'm trying to accomplish - I want to write a
Pivot application using Groovy:
http://pivot-toolkit.org
All Pivot applications implement the pivot.wtk.Application interface. Pivot
includes a
I guess we'd better move that discussion on the Groovy lists, since
it's perhaps too Groovy specific?
Hoping I'm not off-topic, the jar needs to be signed as it uses
reflection, bytecode generation, etc, some things that are prevented
by the default security manager.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at
I guess we'd better move that discussion on the Groovy lists, since
it's perhaps too Groovy specific?
Agreed. What might be a more appropriate group?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups JVM
Languages
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Kenneth Russell wrote:
Java SE 6 Update 10 exposes some new interfaces from the Java Plug-In's
LiveConnect implementation that allows a non-Java language runtime to
hook in to the dispatch sequence for JavaScript operations coming in
from the web browser.
Kenneth Russell wrote:
Java SE 6 Update 10 exposes some new interfaces from the Java Plug-In's
LiveConnect implementation that allows a non-Java language runtime to
hook in to the dispatch sequence for JavaScript operations coming in
from the web browser.
This lets you, the language
19 matches
Mail list logo
