Re: Group prefix on messages

2007-12-01 Thread Alex Blewitt
All my messages to jvm-languages@googlegroups.com are automatically filtered based on a 'to:jvm-languages@googlegroups.com', which then applies a label and archives it. Having a subject doesn't give you anything extra that you can't get from automatic filters applying labels. Alex. On Dec 1,

Re: A HotSpot oddity

2007-12-01 Thread David MacIver
More interesting data points: On a 64-bit machine running linux there's no difference between the client and server times. I don't know whether this is because the 64-bit client and server VM optimisations aren't as different as they are in 32-bit mode or whether there's some advantage to 64-bit

Re: A HotSpot oddity

2007-12-01 Thread Neil Bartlett
Scala faster than C post to reddit, anyone? ;-) On 1 Dec 2007, at 10:53, David MacIver wrote: More interesting data points: On a 64-bit machine running linux there's no difference between the client and server times. I don't know whether this is because the 64-bit client and server VM

Re: A HotSpot oddity

2007-12-01 Thread David MacIver
Surely it's no news that Java is competitive with C for pure numeric operations. On Dec 1, 2007 11:02 AM, Neil Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Scala faster than C post to reddit, anyone? ;-) On 1 Dec 2007, at 10:53, David MacIver wrote: More interesting data points: On a 64-bit

Re: A HotSpot oddity

2007-12-01 Thread David MacIver
I think I've figured out what's going on. I can't figure out how to get sufficient debug information out of the server hotspot to verify this, but it seems to make sense and performing the translation manually produces comparable speedups in the client VM. class Foo{ public static void

Re: Group prefix on messages

2007-12-01 Thread Michael Campbell
Filter on to:jvm-languages (etc) with gmail working for me for years now. shrug On Nov 30, 2007 10:12 PM, David Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 GMail is easier to deal with if stuff is in the title On 11/30/07, Alex Lam S.L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just my 2 cents: I use

Re: Group prefix on messages

2007-12-01 Thread Richard Warburton
I also think that labels are unnecessary. Richard Warburton On Dec 1, 2007 2:11 PM, Michael Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Filter on to:jvm-languages (etc) with gmail working for me for years now. shrug On Nov 30, 2007 10:12 PM, David Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 GMail is

Re: A HotSpot oddity

2007-12-01 Thread David MacIver
On Dec 1, 2007 4:17 PM, Richard Warburton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On a 64-bit machine running linux there's no difference between the client and server times. I don't know whether this is because the 64-bit client and server VM optimisations aren't as different as they are in 32-bit

Re: Group prefix on messages

2007-12-01 Thread Charles Oliver Nutter
Daniel Green wrote: For some users in certain environments/clients it is clear that a prefix would provide clarity. Don't make the assumption that everyone is able to use the gmail web interface. So if some will be helped, as many responders to this post have claimed, the question becomes,

[jvm-l] Re: Group prefix on messages

2007-12-01 Thread Randall R Schulz
On Saturday 01 December 2007 14:31, Daniel Green wrote: For some users in certain environments/clients it is clear that a prefix would provide clarity. Don't make the assumption that everyone is able to use the gmail web interface. It has nothing whatsoever to do with GMail. Any even half-way

[jvm-l] Re: Group prefix on messages

2007-12-01 Thread David Pollak
On Dec 1, 2007 3:20 PM, Randall R Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 01 December 2007 14:31, Daniel Green wrote: For some users in certain environments/clients it is clear that a prefix would provide clarity. Don't make the assumption that everyone is able to use the gmail web