Also, I know that this bugs is fixed in recent kaffe-cvs.
So, If use the latest kaffe-cvs, it doesn't matter.
Thanks.
Or simply use latest released version (1.1.0). Saying 'latest kaffe-cvs'
can be sometimes mislead, especially when time passed :-)
Kiyo
Hi,
I understood your message as the following
,which is supposed to run on SYSTEM-B (--host)
: it means System-B s the system where cross compiler is
installed and works.
Your description is corerct, but you may misunderstand, still...
Let's say SYSTEM-A to be super-fast machine
In message Re: [kaffe] libraries/clib/net/InetAddressImpl.c cannot be compiled on old
Linux
on 03/06/25, Dalibor Topic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But unfortunately, after ./configure I get:
$ grep in_port_t config/config.h
`in_port_t'. */
#define in_port_t unsigned unknown
Hi,
I understood your message as the following
,which is supposed to run on SYSTEM-B (--host)
: it means System-B s the system where cross compiler is
installed and works.
Your description is corerct, but you may misunderstand, still...
Let's say SYSTEM-A to be
Hi Jim,
At the moment, the web page just has the FAQ files from 1.1.0.
That's funny. 'FAQ.cross-compilation' is in the 1.1.0. But it is not
listed in documentation.shtml. This is same for 'FAQ.jit3'. Are
you talking '1.0.7' rather than '1.1.0'?
Kiyo
CVSROOT:/cvs/kaffe
Module name:kaffe
Changes by: dalibor 03/06/26 02:26:30
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog Makefile.am Makefile.in aclocal.m4
config.sub configure iconv.m4
config : Makefile.in config.h.in
CVSROOT:/cvs/kaffe
Module name:kaffe
Changes by: dalibor 03/06/26 02:29:57
Added files:
. : lib-ld.m4 lib-link.m4 lib-prefix.m4
Log message:
added autoconf-lib-link files from gettext 0.11.3
___
kaffe mailing
Hi Ito,
--- Ito Kazumitsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, libiconv had something to do with this program. in_port_t was
made unknown not because conftest returned a wrong result but
because libiconv could not be loaded !?
I've taken that as a hint to update the libiconv detection code to
CVSROOT:/cvs/kaffe
Module name:kaffe
Changes by: dalibor 03/06/26 04:05:39
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog aclocal.m4 configure configure.in
sockinttypes.m4
libraries/clib/native: Makefile.am Makefile.in
Log message:
hi Jim,
--- Jim Pick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I played around a bit on the weekend with Jetty, and trying to get it
working on top of Kaffe with JSPs. Out of the box, Jetty works with the
latest CVS, but not the JSPs. I really wanted to get JSPs working with
something that supports the
--- Kiyo Inaba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jim,
At the moment, the web page just has the FAQ files from 1.1.0.
That's funny. 'FAQ.cross-compilation' is in the 1.1.0. But it is not
listed in documentation.shtml. This is same for 'FAQ.jit3'. Are
you talking '1.0.7' rather than '1.1.0'?
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:32:04PM -0700, Dalibor Topic wrote:
thanks for the bug report and the patch, I've used some code from quakeforge
that hopefully deals with the problem with some autotools magic and a few
ifdefs. Could you check out the latest souces, and give it a try?
it works!
Hi,
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 15:59, Dalibor Topic wrote:
I'm not sure how it will affect kaffe's status in debian though. Didn't they
have that weird policy that if we used ant anywhere, kaffe would have to be
removed from debian-free? Or am I just misremembering last year's big licensing
Hi guys,
--- Jim Pick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm proposing we call it kaffe-external-jars. Having only spent 30
seconds thinking of the right name for it, I'm open to a less wordy name
for the module. I'd like to avoid checking in binaries. Instead, we
could do something more along
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 08:16, Rob Gonzalez wrote:
I did some googling about the licensing issues, and it does seem that if
we ship kaffe with a copy of Ant then we would not be included in
debian-free anymore...the Apache license is not GPL-compatible. We can
clearly use Ant all we want for
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 07:09, Dalibor Topic wrote:
--- Kiyo Inaba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jim,
At the moment, the web page just has the FAQ files from 1.1.0.
That's funny. 'FAQ.cross-compilation' is in the 1.1.0. But it is not
listed in documentation.shtml. This is same for
On 26 Jun 2003 18:56:37 +0200
Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 18:04, Jim Pick wrote:
Actually, distributing some non-GPL compatible apps along with the VM
sources is not a bad way to help people understand how we interpret the
licensing issues.
Are
Jim Pick wrote:
If Debian and the FSF still have issues, we can produce an additional
tarball without the Apache stuff. The additional stuff is primarily a
convenience for the end users to help satisfy build-time dependencies,
and distributing it is really optional.
Isn't the problem that Ant
hi jim,
--- Jim Pick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 07:09, Dalibor Topic wrote:
I updated the page, so it now has links to both the 1.1.0 and CVS
versions of the documents.
It turns out it was my fault anyways - I had forgotten to add the new
files to the page.
thanks a
In message Re: [kaffe] libraries/clib/net/InetAddressImpl.c cannot be compiled on old
Linux
on 03/06/26, Dalibor Topic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've taken that as a hint to update the libiconv detection code to the latest
version from gettext 0.11.3. Could you try again with the current
Hi.
I have updated kaffe-tree with kaffe-1.1.0.
But I have a new problem for compiling kaffe.
I have already succeeded in compiling kaffe( it is kaffe-1.0.7 and may be
version of cvs-about April.)
So I copied a generated binary kaffe tree to my embedded system. I tested
kaffe regression
21 matches
Mail list logo
