Hi Tim,
--- Timothy Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Saturday, December 28, 2002, at 11:03 AM,
> Dalibor Topic wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've taken a second look at the pure java zip from
> GNU
> > Classpath.
> > I compared memory consumption using -verbosemem on
> > i386-linux with
> > j
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 15:33:01 +0100
Helmer Krämer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
replying to myself here.
> P.S.: Sorry if this was a little bit confusing,
> I'll send a complete, cleaned-up patch of
> these changes when gzz is working
I've revised my first patch a little bit (th
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 15:00:14 -0800 (PST)
Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Dalibor,
> So I'd be glad if someone with more kaffeh hacking
> experience could
> take a closer look at it and tell me if I'm missing
> something
> obvious. As a bit of background motivation, this is
> the last
On Sunday, December 29, 2002, at 08:03 AM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Hi Tim,
hi
You need to apply the GNU Classpath java.util.zip
replacement patch, available at
http://www.kaffe.org/~robilad/zip-replacement-patch.tgz
and to copy the Klasses.jar.bootstrap file over the
existing copy in libraries
--- Timothy Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The thing thats tickling the bug is the static
> initializers
> in UnicodeTbl/UnicodeIdx. They are so large that
> they
> need a ton of memory to be compiled. So they force
> the jitter's label/const/seq object pools to be
> grown to
> an enormous s
Dear Kaffe experts.
Because it is my first time to post message in this mailing
list,
let me introduce a little bit.
Hello, my name is Seongbeom Kim, and I'm working for a digital
television project
that requires Java virtual machine. I've chosen Kaffe for our
virtual machine
