Re: [kaffe] avr32 port

2008-05-08 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Nevo wrote: There has been a crazy idea for me to embed kaffe VM or phoneme CDC vm to Linux kernel as a separate module to speed up vm execution,so vm can directly access hardware. But you know,that should break up the role of JVM as a sandbox.. and we chould not

Re: [kaffe] avr32 port

2008-05-08 Thread Nevo
hi,Guennadi: Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: On Thu, 8 May 2008, Nevo wrote: There has been a crazy idea for me to embed kaffe VM or phoneme CDC vm to Linux kernel as a separate module to speed up vm execution,so vm can directly access hardware. But you know,that should break up the role

Re: [kaffe] avr32 port

2008-05-08 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Nevo wrote: Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: On Thu, 8 May 2008, Nevo wrote: There has been a crazy idea for me to embed kaffe VM or phoneme CDC vm to Linux kernel as a separate module to speed up vm execution,so vm can directly access hardware. But you

Re: [kaffe] avr32 port

2008-05-08 Thread Nevo
hi,Guennadi: Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: On Thu, 8 May 2008, Nevo wrote: Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: On Thu, 8 May 2008, Nevo wrote: There has been a crazy idea for me to embed kaffe VM or phoneme CDC vm to Linux kernel as a separate module to speed up vm

Re: [kaffe] avr32 port

2008-05-08 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Nevo wrote: Well, I'm not an expert in this, but I don't know if this really would make any improvement. With hardware acceleration you just throw your bytecode at the CPU and it processes it just as if it were native code. So, I don't see how JIT could be useful here.

Re: [kaffe] avr32 port

2008-05-08 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Nevo wrote: Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: On Thu, 8 May 2008, Nevo wrote: Well, I'm not an expert in this, but I don't know if this really would make any improvement. With hardware acceleration you just throw your bytecode at the CPU and it

Re: [kaffe] avr32 port

2008-05-08 Thread Nevo
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: On Thu, 8 May 2008, Nevo wrote: Well, I'm not an expert in this, but I don't know if this really would make any improvement. With hardware acceleration you just throw your bytecode at the CPU and it processes it just as if it were native code. So, I don't see