On Tuesday 26 March 2002 14:07, Jukka Santala wrote:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Sticking to a standard environment would just limit the number of
people able to contribute results.
That's one of the things I'm afraid of. The last thing we want is people
upgrading their
On Monday 25 March 2002 10:32, Jukka Santala wrote:
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Do you have any specific benchmarks in mind?
Not particularily, but despite the subject-line on this thread, I agree
with the view we should probably stay with open-source benchmarks. Ashes
looks
On Friday 22 March 2002 11:27, Jukka Santala wrote:
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Now you're confusing me, as well. As noted above, modifying code on one
platform can affect the performance of other platforms (or other code
paths) negatively, and I doubt most developers bother to
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Speaking of benchmarking suites, there is Ashes from the SableVM people.
http://www.sable.mcgill.ca/ashes/
I think it's open source, so I'd prefer that. :)
Okay, thanks, I'll take a look at that. There are also some open source
conformance
On Thursday 21 March 2002 10:24, Jukka Santala wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Speaking of benchmarking suites, there is Ashes from the SableVM people.
http://www.sable.mcgill.ca/ashes/
I think it's open source, so I'd prefer that. :)
Okay, thanks, I'll take a look at
On Tuesday 19 March 2002 10:30, Jukka Santala wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Jim Pick wrote:
Maybe we can order a copy for kaffe.org and put it on the server? I'm
sure TVT will spot the $50 or $100 bucks. Interested in that?
Speaking of benchmarking suites, there is Ashes from the SableVM
They test kaffe using it here.
http://www.shudo.net/jit/perf/
There are some issues (can't load it as an applet, needs a larger heap).
Maybe we can order a copy for kaffe.org and put it on the server? I'm sure
TVT will spot the $50 or $100 bucks. Interested in that?
Cheers,
- Jim
-
