Hi,
On Sun, 29 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want, I'll do one patch update the included version to 2.0 Bison (which
uses an updated skeleton) and then, separately, a patch updating
zconf.tab.c_shipped to reflect the updated zconf.y.
I'd prefer to patch the changes into
Hi,
On Tue, 31 May 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
there's still the point that it's currently used inconsistently.
Why is it so important to fix this inconsistency?
Why is it so difficult to accept that both are valid options?
bye, Roman
---
Hi,
On Tue, 31 May 2005, Blaisorblade wrote:
I can regenerate it only with bison 2.0, since that's what I have installed.
So if you don't want it to be regenerated, you cannot accept my patch. I
proposed sending two patches to avoid mixing the bison changes with this
patch changes, that's
