---BeginMessage---
Hi,
as --compress-debug-sections will generate compressed debug sections
with section names .zdebug*. This patch puts .zdebug* section on
white list.
--
H.J.
diff --git a/scripts/mod/modpost.c b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
index 6a087ff..2bab622 100644
--- a/scripts/mod/modpost.c
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
Seen it to - but were busy with other stuff.
If you do a
$ make V=2
Then you will notice that kbuild tells you that the .o files are built because
they are not listed in $(targets).
Thanks. That was the missing bit. Didn't know about V=2, that's quite
handy.
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:49:48PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
Now, Sam, see how people are trying to escape from the noise of the
LKML. Yet you are not CC patches and anything here, e.g. .23 updates :(
I prefer to have kbuild stuff in the public aka lkml.
I should reflect
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
If we go the save important parts of the config I prefer
something along the suggestion by hpa with a config file.
The config file should though be named along the lines
of Kbuild.config and the syntax should be future proof.
I like the syntax of the .git/config file and
I would like to *strongly* suggest adding the following feature to
Kbuild -- a file which can hold one's own make variables in any one
object (not source!) directory.
It's ridiculous to have to type:
[incidentally, the BIARCH test in arch/i386/Makefile doesn't seem to
work with CC='ccache gcc'
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
This will likely appear in my kbuild.git tree but only
when next mergewindow opens I think.
My current batch (35 commits) has not yet been pulled
and this would no see exposure in -mm first.
Cool. I have a workaround (the old trick of building sideways objects
as used
Hello,
I would like to get rid of arch/x86_64/boot, which *should* be binary
identical with arch/i386/boot (it's not right now, but I'm fixing that.)
Is there a way to make Kbuild decend so that src=arch/i386/boot but
obj=arch/x86_64/boot (which may entail having to create directories even
when
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 01:14:15PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
Would it be OK if we have arch/x86_64/boot present and have stub Makefiles
in all directories?
If thats OK I can try to cook up something.
That's certainly acceptable as an interrim
