On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 02:50:03AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
In a couple of cases I have had the need to include a Kconfig file only
if present.
The current 'source' directive works as one would expect. It bails out
if the file is missing.
I don't really like it, it's an open invitation to abuse.
I'd rather like to see the user first, which might need it.
Understood.
I will save this until I have a very good example where I need it.
Sam
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click
___
kbuild-devel mailing list
kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
