On Sun, 14 Apr 2002 23:23:16 +1000,
Keith Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Updates for kbuild 2.5 at
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=18813
kbuild-2.5-i386-2.5.8-pre3-1.bz2
i386-2.5.8-pre3-1 was missing this bit, against i386-2.5.8-pre3-1.
Apply this patch or use
Updates for kbuild 2.5 at
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=18813
I made the mistake of use the sourceforge fast release system. Turns
out it creates new releases for each file so there are multiple
'Release 2.0' headings. Ignore that, they are all part of Release 2.0.
New core and common code for kbuild 2.5 is available in
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=18813release_id=83065
Changes from core-3 to core-4.
GNUism removal.
WISH is exposed in case your wish binary is not in /usr/bin/wish.
awk changed to $(AWK) throughout.
New core, common and ia64 code for kbuild 2.5 is available in
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=18813release_id=83065
Changes from core-2 to core-3.
Ensure that database records are aligned. Do not assume that keys
are aligned (all the world is not a 386).
Changes from
On 09 Apr 2002 12:00:55 -0700,
Thomas Duffy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, with core-3, now kbuild 2.5 v2.0 works on sparc64. There was one
typo in one sparc64 Makefile.in from 1.12. Attached is the patch to fix
this.
Also attached is the full kbuild 2.0 patch for sparc64 2.4.18 tree.
Thanks
On Sun, 07 Apr 2002 16:18:12 +0200,
Roman Zippel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
touch include/linux/mm.h doesn't cause a recompile of any object.
I have found a bug that is probably causing your problem. Can you
confirm that you are using a common source and object directory, i.e.
no separate object
Hi,
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Keith Owens wrote:
touch include/linux/mm.h doesn't cause a recompile of any object.
I have found a bug that is probably causing your problem. Can you
confirm that you are using a common source and object directory, i.e.
no separate object tree?
Yes, so far I
Hi,
Keith Owens wrote:
It takes time to do all the analysis to work out what has changed and
what has been affected. You might know that you only changed one file
but kernel build and make don't know that until they have checked
everything. Changing one file or specifying a command
Keith Owens wrote:
It takes time to do all the analysis to work out what has changed and
what has been affected. You might know that you only changed one file
but kernel build and make don't know that until they have checked
everything. Changing one file or specifying a command override
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 12:03:15PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
The timings above were for exactly the same .config on the same build
machine,
Can you provide details of this machine?
--
Russell King ([EMAIL PROTECTED])The developer of ARM Linux
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002 17:35:39 +0100,
Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 12:03:15PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
The timings above were for exactly the same .config on the same build
machine,
Can you provide details of this machine?
It was in the original message.
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 01:09:14PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Nice, but what about decrypted version?
It's signed. Just pipe it through gpg with Keiths public key.
___
kbuild-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 05 Apr 2002 21:26:08 +1000,
Keith Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kbuild 2.4:
make oldconfig0:07
make dep 0:37 (make -j dep is unsafe on some architectures)
make -j8 bzImage modules 14:16
Total15:00
make
Thanks to Peter Samuelson and Tom Duffy, 2.4.18 i386 patches are now
available for kbuild 2.5. Instructions at the start of each patch.
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=18813release_id=83065
kbuild-2.5-core-1.bz2 (unchanged)
kbuild-2.5-common-2.4.18-1.bz2 (new)
14 matches
Mail list logo
