On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 06:51:45AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
[]
> > > There are several small things that are not addressed in todays
> > > implementation and that will be fixed one way or the other.
> >
> > Did they get addressed year later or not? What they were (are)?
>
> Nope.
> I have not
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 02:15:57AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> * Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:26:54 +0200
>
> >> read.o <- read.c
> > It will only do this if you ask for it.
> > The question was what happened when you did make read.o
> >
> >> foo.o <- foo.c
> >> bar.o <- bar.c
> >> built-in.o <- re
* Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:26:54 +0200
>> read.o <- read.c
> It will only do this if you ask for it.
> The question was what happened when you did make read.o
>
>> foo.o <- foo.c
>> bar.o <- bar.c
>> built-in.o <- read.c foo.c bar.c
>>
>> (cf. default current:
>> built-in.o <- read.o foo.o b
