https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
Maik Qualmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version Fixed In||7.7.0
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
soredake changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ndrzj1...@relay.firefox.com
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
--- Comment #20 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Maik,
Why this file still open even the comment from comment #18 ?
Gilles
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
--- Comment #19 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
digiKam 7.0.0 stable release is now published:
https://www.digikam.org/news/2020-07-19-7.0.0_release_announcement/
We need a fresh feedback on this file using this version.
Best Regards
Gilles
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Metadata|Maintenance-Metadata
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
--- Comment #18 from Mario Frank ---
Git commit 2f8ddd42ef62d7aea9e490cdb05ffcc644810c81 by Mario Frank.
Committed on 22/02/2017 at 15:05.
Pushed by mfrank into branch 'master'.
Merged the current state of the garbage
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.0.0 |5.4.0
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
--- Comment #17 from Simon ---
Hi Gilles,
This problem is still the same. I reduced it for me by using internal
mysql database and preloading most of the database to memory.
When testing with appimage, sqlite on system hd and data
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||caulier.gil...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
Bizy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||koen.b...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
--- Comment #14 from Simon ---
Indeed, my setup is far from optimal for disk io. I have both the
database and the images on a ntfs pratition of a hard disk on my laptop
(at least not system hd). I thought that the database would
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
--- Comment #13 from Maik Qualmann ---
This is are long waiting times, up to 5 seconds until a scan is completed for
one image. Disabling the scanning does not help, he would be rescheduled in any
case. Modification date or file
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
--- Comment #12 from Simon ---
Created attachment 98665
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=98665=edit
Command line output in the middle of writing metadat to files with
scancontroller2.patch
I applied the patch and added
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
--- Comment #11 from Simon ---
Created attachment 98664
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=98664=edit
Startup of digikam and start of writing metadata with scancontroller2.patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
--- Comment #10 from Simon ---
Do I apply this patch on top of the current HEAD or on top of your
previous patch? I guess the first, but just to be sure.
On 27/04/16 21:14, Maik Qualmann via KDE Bugzilla wrote:
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
--- Comment #9 from Maik Qualmann ---
Created attachment 98651
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=98651=edit
scancontroller2.patch
That it is now slowly working because now images are processed with symbolic
links.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
Maik Qualmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #98521|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
--- Comment #8 from Simon ---
And the scan is now going clearly slower than before the patch. I am now
running it almost two days and its at 3% only.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
--- Comment #7 from Simon ---
Created attachment 98528
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=98528=edit
Command line output in the middle of writing metadat to files with
scancontroller.patch
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
--- Comment #6 from Simon ---
Created attachment 98527
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=98527=edit
Startup of digikam and start of writing metadata with scancontroller.patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
--- Comment #5 from Simon ---
Thanks for looking into this. I applied your patch. The results seems to be the
same (maybe somewhat less frequent rescans). I attached the initial part of the
log after startup, where redundant stuff
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
--- Comment #4 from Maik Qualmann ---
Created attachment 98521
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=98521=edit
scancontroller.patch
Can you try this test patch? And report how digiKam now behaves.
Maik
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
Maik Qualmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||metzping...@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
--- Comment #2 from Maik Qualmann ---
Git commit 773f9361e5df5904c938ad9ee4cbb19acd1aa1f6 by Maik Qualmann.
Committed on 21/04/2016 at 19:03.
Pushed by mqualmann into branch 'master'.
fix absolute file path without symbolic
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362023
--- Comment #1 from Simon ---
Created attachment 98490
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=98490=edit
Command line output of writing metadata to files.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
25 matches
Mail list logo