https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361546
m...@bluelife.info changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@bluelife.info
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361546
Simon Andric changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simonandr...@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361546
--- Comment #5 from Raghavendra kamath ---
by using build type to "KritaDevs" in cmake as guided by dmitry and zagge I was
able to get on par performance from the basic brushes in 3.0 , so this bug is
now invalid. they were
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361546
Boudewijn Rempt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361546
--- Comment #4 from Raghavendra kamath ---
A workaround for now is to avoid using auto spacing and keeping the spacing
above .08 , the brushes then behave normally
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361546
--- Comment #3 from Raghavendra kamath ---
Switching to lesser Vc version made a difference although the lag is still
there on higher size values above 300-450 px ,
I noticed most of the basic brushes suffer from this. For
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361546
wolthera changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||griffinval...@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361546
--- Comment #1 from Raghavendra kamath ---
Created attachment 98301
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=98301=edit
Brush performance in 3.0 vs 2.9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug