subject:"\[kwin\] \[Bug 368201\] Desktop Effect Filter"

[kwin] [Bug 368201] Desktop Effect Filter

2017-01-02 Thread andreas

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368201 --- Comment #7 from andreas --- if the filter is needed for "bugtracking" or whatever it should be called, than add some usefull stuff for the filter. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[kwin] [Bug 368201] Desktop Effect Filter

2016-09-05 Thread Martin Gräßlin via KDE Bugzilla

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368201 --- Comment #6 from Martin Gräßlin --- > If we don't want users to see something, don't let them see it, why have an > option to show it anyway? >From a KWin maintenance and bug report perspective: we get requests to have the

[kwin] [Bug 368201] Desktop Effect Filter

2016-09-05 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer via KDE Bugzilla

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368201 Thomas Pfeiffer changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[kwin] [Bug 368201] Desktop Effect Filter

2016-09-04 Thread andreas via KDE Bugzilla

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368201 --- Comment #4 from andreas --- sorry. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[kwin] [Bug 368201] Desktop Effect Filter

2016-09-04 Thread Martin Gräßlin via KDE Bugzilla

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368201 --- Comment #3 from Martin Gräßlin --- I asked for an elaboration for the change. My questions were without any judgment from my side. I just want to have an explanation on why this should be changed. It reads to me like you assumed

[kwin] [Bug 368201] Desktop Effect Filter

2016-09-04 Thread andreas via KDE Bugzilla

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368201 --- Comment #2 from andreas --- than the filter should be removed. If you want to have an filter is should not say if you don't activate this I will show you all effects that are not supported. It's way to complicated. A filter