https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400540
Bug Janitor Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |WORKSFORME
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400540
--- Comment #15 from Bug Janitor Service ---
Dear Bug Submitter,
This bug has been in NEEDSINFO status with no change for at least
15 days. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and set the bug status as REPORTED. Due to regular
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400540
Andrius Štikonas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400540
--- Comment #13 from Andrius Štikonas ---
(In reply to Dal Monico from comment #12)
> Thank you
Do you want to debug this further now that KPM 4.0 is released? Or should I
close this as won't fix?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400540
--- Comment #12 from Dal Monico ---
Thank you
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400540
--- Comment #11 from Andrius Štikonas ---
I've now pushed change that prints commands to terminal if KPMCORE_DEBUG shell
variable is set.
Sof if you run KPMCORE_DEBUG=y partitionmanager, you'll see what commands are
being run and maybe you'll spot the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400540
--- Comment #10 from Andrius Štikonas ---
(In reply to Dal Monico from comment #9)
> My computer is almost 10 years old, so compiling on it is not great (and I
> would rather avoid it). Generally, I try to avoid installing packages
> outside of my
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400540
--- Comment #9 from Dal Monico ---
It took me a long time to complete the operations with my server so I just got
a chance to test the different kernel theory. I was using kernel 4.18, so it
was possible older kernels did not display this behavior. To
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400540
--- Comment #8 from Andrius Štikonas ---
(In reply to Dal Monico from comment #7)
> This may be kernel related. There was a similar report just made on the
> Manjaro forum regarding gparted. The user reported the same long start time
> on kernels above
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400540
--- Comment #7 from Dal Monico ---
This may be kernel related. There was a similar report just made on the Manjaro
forum regarding gparted. The user reported the same long start time on kernels
above 4.17. I can't shut down to test different kernels
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400540
Andrius Štikonas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
Priority|NOR
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400540
--- Comment #5 from Dal Monico ---
Well I'm happy to report good news.
I found a solution for this by writing a systemd mount unit. I only just now
wrote the unit and tested it out briefly. It seems absolutely problem free in
my limited testing so
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400540
--- Comment #4 from Dal Monico ---
Sorry I did not see your message until just now. I checked and it was indeed
running the fsdisk backend.
I am going to see if I can get KPM to start properly with a systemd mount unit.
I will get back to you with the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400540
--- Comment #3 from Andrius Štikonas ---
(In reply to Dal Monico from comment #2)
> I installed kpmcore-git and partitionmanager-git. The newer version ran fine
> without the NFS entries in fstab. Unfortunately, when the NFS entries were
> returned to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400540
--- Comment #2 from Dal Monico ---
Thank you for your attention on this matter.
I installed kpmcore-git and partitionmanager-git. The newer version ran fine
without the NFS entries in fstab. Unfortunately, when the NFS entries were
returned to fstab
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400540
--- Comment #1 from Andrius Štikonas ---
Can anybody retest this bug with KPM from git?
There were a lot of changes which might affect it (libparted backend was
replaced with sfdisk).
fstab is not used at by KPM during the scan (but maybe some of the
16 matches
Mail list logo
