[valgrind] [Bug 450705] s390x: Add NNPA support (arch14)

2024-04-29 Thread Andreas Arnez
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450705 Andreas Arnez changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[valgrind] [Bug 450705] s390x: Add NNPA support (arch14)

2024-04-18 Thread Mark Wielaard
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450705 --- Comment #8 from Mark Wielaard --- (In reply to Andreas Arnez from comment #7) > (In reply to Andreas Arnez from comment #6) > > Created attachment 168623 [details] > > Updated version of the extension proposal > I pushed this now, as a preparation

[valgrind] [Bug 450705] s390x: Add NNPA support (arch14)

2024-04-18 Thread Andreas Arnez
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450705 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Arnez --- (In reply to Andreas Arnez from comment #6) > Created attachment 168623 [details] > Updated version of the extension proposal I pushed this now, as a preparation to adding NNPA support. If there are still any

[valgrind] [Bug 450705] s390x: Add NNPA support (arch14)

2024-04-17 Thread Andreas Arnez
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450705 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Arnez --- Created attachment 168623 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=168623=edit Updated version of the extension proposal This updated version of the extension proposal addresses the following: * Add a comment

[valgrind] [Bug 450705] s390x: Add NNPA support (arch14)

2024-04-17 Thread Mark Wielaard
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450705 --- Comment #5 from Mark Wielaard --- I haven't reviewed the fully proposal, but in general I like the idea of using the same mechanism as the syscalls for instrumenting these more complex instructions. It is at least familiar. You might want to rename

[valgrind] [Bug 450705] s390x: Add NNPA support (arch14)

2024-04-17 Thread Andreas Arnez
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450705 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Arnez --- (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #3) > Extension idea was posted to the mailinglist: > https://sourceforge.net/p/valgrind/mailman/message/58753610/ Right. I'd like to go ahead with this, if that's OK. There

[valgrind] [Bug 450705] s390x: Add NNPA support (arch14)

2024-04-16 Thread Mark Wielaard
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450705 --- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard --- Extension idea was posted to the mailinglist: https://sourceforge.net/p/valgrind/mailman/message/58753610/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 450705] s390x: Add NNPA support (arch14)

2023-01-11 Thread Charles Volzka
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450705 Charles Volzka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cjvol...@us.ibm.com -- You are receiving

[valgrind] [Bug 450705] s390x: Add NNPA support (arch14)

2022-09-21 Thread Andreas Arnez
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450705 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Arnez --- Small update: I'm now considering a different approach that's more similar to the way system calls are handled. Instead of calling a dirty helper, we would have the dispatcher call a guest-specific extension and

[valgrind] [Bug 450705] s390x: Add NNPA support (arch14)

2022-08-11 Thread Mark Wielaard
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450705 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@klomp.org -- You are receiving this mail

[valgrind] [Bug 450705] s390x: Add NNPA support (arch14)

2022-08-10 Thread Andreas Arnez
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450705 Andreas Arnez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|ASSIGNED Assignee|jsew...@acm.org