https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486180
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362680
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||v...@altlinux.org
--- Comment #6 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482358
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485924
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
So the only tricky part is that we want to mimic this part of the (generic)
PRE(sys_kill):
/* If we're sending SIGKILL, check to see if the target is one of
our threads and handle it specially
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485924
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485778
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|CONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485778
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #168679|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485778
--- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard ---
Created attachment 168679
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=168679=edit
core errors gensuppressions support
Initial implementation for --gen-suppressions support for core errors
With this the testc
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485778
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jsew...@acm.org |m...@klomp.org
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328563
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|CONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362680
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362680
--- Comment #4 from Mark Wielaard ---
bug #328563 has an attachment that implements this
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450705
--- Comment #8 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Andreas Arnez from comment #7)
> (In reply to Andreas Arnez from comment #6)
> > Created attachment 168623 [details]
> > Updated version of the extension proposal
> I pushed this now
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450705
--- Comment #5 from Mark Wielaard ---
I haven't reviewed the fully proposal, but in general I like the idea of using
the same mechanism as the syscalls for instrumenting these more complex
instructions. It is at least familiar. You might want to rename
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450705
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
Extension idea was posted to the mailinglist:
https://sourceforge.net/p/valgrind/mailman/message/58753610/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485276
--- Comment #4 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #3)
> I am unable to replicate this with either clang version 17.0.6 or 18.1.2,
> not with -O2 or -O1.
On x86_64. Missed that the original report was against arm64
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485276
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #3 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472329
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481874
--- Comment #17 from Mark Wielaard ---
.git-blame-ignore-revs references a clang-format rev that doesn't exist in
tree.
Makefile.all.am and Makefile.tool.am look correct.
NEWS OK.
VEX changes OK, except for unnecessarily extending VexGuestARM64State
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485487
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|CONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485487
--- Comment #7 from Mark Wielaard ---
There is now also an fedora eln build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2437715
Since eln is build with -march=x86-64-v3 this might be a good testing
environment.
Please let me know if you
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485487
--- Comment #6 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #5)
> I'll add it to the next fedora rawhide valgrind build so we can test it a
> bit more.
There is now valgrind-3.22.0-8.fc41 with this and some other (x86-64-v3)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485487
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485487
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #1 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463458
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463463
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481127
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481127
--- Comment #10 from Mark Wielaard ---
Created attachment 168440
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=168440=edit
valgrind.fma_arm64.diff
This is the variant of the patch that I tested.
It looks good to me.
How should we credit this w
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481127
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463458
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #1 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463456
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #1 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463463
--- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard ---
These seem rounding issues, fixed by
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481127
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463463
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #1 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377966
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Error message said to |arm64 unhandled instruction
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479600
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Segmentation fault |Segmentation fault
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481874
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #9 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=484426
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #6 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=484002
--- Comment #5 from Mark Wielaard ---
Comment on attachment 167483
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=167483
first attempt at a patch
Very nice.
Before the patch:
$ ~/src/valgrind/vg-in-place ./t
==66177== Memcheck, a memory error detec
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=484002
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #2 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483711
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #5 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471222
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471222
--- Comment #17 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Paul Floyd from comment #14)
> On second thoughts, isn't the fdleak_ipv4 double close message expected?
Yes, it is. It also failed for me locally. I added it to the
none/tests/fdleak_ipv4.stderr.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471222
--- Comment #16 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Paul Floyd from comment #13)
> I had to modify double_close_range.c and socket_close.c like this
>
> #if defined(__linux__)
> #include
> #endif
>
> I get 3 new failures
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471222
--- Comment #15 from Mark Wielaard ---
I needed the following on a system that didn't have close_range:
diff --git a/none/tests/Makefile.am b/none/tests/Makefile.am
index f56eb7faab67..a37bb27257a6 100644
--- a/none/tests/Makefile.am
+++ b/none/tests
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482358
--- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard ---
See also https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362680 which contains a
description how to resurrect CoreErrors (but no patch yet?)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482358
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ahajk...@redhat.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471222
--- Comment #8 from Mark Wielaard ---
BTW. In that testcase memcheck/tests/freebsd/close_range.c it has:
/* It looks like close_range was initially implemented for FreeBSD 13
* but without CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC
* That implementation got back ported
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471222
--- Comment #7 from Mark Wielaard ---
I forgot about freebsd, sorry.
But I see the close_range wrappers are almost identical, so that is good.
We can adapt them together.
And freebsd already has ./memcheck/tests/freebsd/close_range.vgtest
Lets see
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478624
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480126
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #1 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331311
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ahajk...@redhat.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362680
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337388
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162848
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||borntrae...@de.ibm.com
--- Comment #24 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253308
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471222
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ahajk...@redhat.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202770
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ahajk...@redhat.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311655
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ahajk...@redhat.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479661
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ahajk...@redhat.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=477992
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=477198
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
Also added to the VALGRIND_3_22_BRANCH as:
commit a43e62dddcf51ec6578a90c5988a41e856b44b05 (HEAD -> VALGRIND_3_22_BRANCH)
Author: Mark Wielaard
Date: Sat Nov 18 21:17:02 2023 +0100
Add fchmodat2 sysc
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476465
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478211
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #1 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476548
--- Comment #9 from Mark Wielaard ---
Also pushed to VALGRIND_3_22_BRANCH as:
commit 1d00e5ce0fb069911c4b525ec38289fb5d9021b0
Author: Paul Floyd
Date: Sat Nov 18 08:49:34 2023 +0100
Bug 476548 - valgrind 3.22.0 fails on assertion when loading
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476548
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #8 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=477198
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|CONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=477719
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281059
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=237920
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DOWNSTREAM
Status|CONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328563
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #127438|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=477198
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jsew...@acm.org |m...@klomp.org
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=477198
Bug ID: 477198
Summary: Add fchmodat2 syscall on linux
Classification: Developer tools
Product: valgrind
Version: 3.22 GIT
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476708
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476708
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|jsew...@acm.org
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253383
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #2 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200829
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206618
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=308027
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306340
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=266045
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |UNMAINTAINED
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476895
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #1 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345414
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.mozilla.or
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471340
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345414
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380183
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345414
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||toralf.foers...@gmx.de
--- Comment #16 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345414
--- Comment #15 from Mark Wielaard ---
Also note this patch that implements more of seccomp:
https://sourceforge.net/p/valgrind/mailman/message/46305485/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476978
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
Summary|[SSE4.1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401284
--- Comment #11 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Paul Floyd from comment #9)
> > src_orig, \
> > (Addr)dst-(Addr)dst_orig+1, \
> > - (Addr)sr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460616
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460616
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401284
--- Comment #4 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to AL from comment #3)
> My point was that strncat() will never even encounter the terminating '\0'
> byte in the source string because its counter (5) will be depleted to 0
&g
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401284
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #2 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463859
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #4 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444224
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476662
--- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard ---
Is this only an issue with this hand assembly?
It would be interesting to see real code that uses this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476708
Bug ID: 476708
Summary: valgrind-monitor.py regular expressions should use raw
strings
Classification: Developer tools
Product: valgrind
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476662
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476553
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #1 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402833
--- Comment #10 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #9)
> Created attachment 162737 [details]
> disable overlap check and test for linux-amd64
>
> More subtle workaround patch that only disables the overlap che
1 - 100 of 1198 matches
Mail list logo