https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
Simon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.mul...@yahoo.de
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
swatilodh...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit||https://quickgit.kde.org/?p
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #102 from swatilodh...@gmail.com ---
Maik
Could this file be closed now, with the last commit?
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #101 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Git commit eb6318a45efe1e08f35da450633f3bcb1027fd6a by Swati Lodha.
Committed on 16/07/2016 at 09:51.
Pushed by swatil into branch 'master'.
Remove _digikam_root_tag_ from tag tree-view
M +3-1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #100 from e.longuem...@laposte.net ---
Hello,
Le samedi 16 juillet 2016 à 09:28 +, via KDE Bugzilla a écrit :
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
>
> --- Comment #99 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
> "In an old DB the tag
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #99 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
"In an old DB the tag _Digikam_root_tag_ still exists"
It's clear. If this tag still appear in tree-view, certainly it's assigned to
item as well (as a normal tag). As Maik can reproduce the problem
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #98 from swatilodh...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #94)
> I confirm : new patch is really better as not _root_ tag appear in tree-view
> after face scan. Good job Swati...
Thank you!
(In reply to caulier.gilles
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #97 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
The fuzzy FingerPrints process is done. No _root_ tag here...
I restarted digiKam just to be sure, no _root_ tag here...
Gilles
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #96 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Maik,
metadathub.cpp::line 553 and imagescanner.cpp::line 840 has all rules to
prevent _root_ tag to be imported to DB.
So for your problem "In an old DB the tag _Digikam_root_tag_ still exists", I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #95 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Now i will scan items to generate fuzzy fingerprints to find duplicates.
Gilles
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #94 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
I confirm : new patch is really better as not _root_ tag appear in tree-view
after face scan. Good job Swati...
Gilles
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #92 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
The first scan is complete with the new patch version. It took 20 mn !
The _root_ tag is not restored. So it's not present in my images metadata or
Metadata Hub do the job properly. This point still to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #91 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Another problem : If images in collection have been previously managed with
option to save tags in image metadata, the _root_ tags will be restored in a
fresh database.
I'm sure that my collection is
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #90 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Maik,
Currently i test with new version patch. Do you seen that splashscreen is
frozen on screen while long first scanning without any progress indicator and
without any text message on the top ?
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #89 from swatilodh...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #84)
> In an old DB the tag _Digikam_root_tag_ still exists. When a new DB is
> created, the tag _Digikam_root_tag_ no longer appear. Do we need QRegExp? Is
> enough
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #88 from Maik Qualmann ---
Gilles,
No slow DB access with a new internal DB on the first scan here.
Maik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #87 from Maik Qualmann ---
Gilles,
I have tested it with patch #100118.
Maik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #86 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Maik,
Do you seen any slow down performance with a fresh DB created, typically at
first scan ? Look in the console if registration to DB take time latency (1/2
seconds here). Previously, i never see
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #85 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Maik,
i cannot confirm your comment #84. I run digiKam with patch version 100045 with
a fresh database (i delete /var/lib/mysql and restart mysqld to be sure. The DB
created is clean. I create myself
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
Maik Qualmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||metzping...@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #83 from swatilodh...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 100118
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=100118=edit
Updated patch
Still the same results?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
swatilodh...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #100045|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #82 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
root tag in Tags view from left and right sidebars.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/digikam/27714438463/in/dateposted-public/
Gilles Caulier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #81 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
digiKam 5.1.0 screenhot with root tag in face tree-view:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/digikam/28219572102/in/dateposted-public/
Gilles Caulier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #80 from swatilodh...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #79)
> Tested here. Context :
skip...
> * _Digikam_root_tag_ still in DB schema. It's the expected behavior ?
Yes. The tag would be present in the schema, but not
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #79 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Tested here. Context :
- Mysql DB from host Linux computer
- DK client running on a Linux under a VM.
- VM is connected to host DB through the network.
- DB on host is build from scratch.
*
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.8.0 |5.0.0
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|MYSQL : a new label |MYSQL : a new label
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #78 from swatilodh...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 100045
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=100045=edit
Please test this with latest git/master and see if this fix this issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
swatilodh...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #100044|moveTag.patch |.patch
filename|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #77 from swatilodh...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 100044
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=100044=edit
Please test this with latest git/master and see if this fix this issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
swatilodh...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #99954|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #76 from Richard Mortimer ---
Looks good to me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #75 from swatilodh...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 99954
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=99954=edit
Combined patch
1) Avoid duplicates in Tags table
2) Removes _digikam_root_tag_ from UI
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
swatilodh...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #99945|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
swatilodh...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #99951|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #74 from swatilodh...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 99951
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=99951=edit
Removes _Digikam_root_tag_ from GUI
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
swatilodh...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #99945|0 |1
is patch|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
swatilodh...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #99945|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #73 from swatilodh...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 99945
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=99945=edit
To remove duplicates from Tags table
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #72 from Richard Mortimer ---
I've tended to keep LONGTEXT and use a length on the index. That way a long tag
name will not totally break things - but will likely cause unexpected
behaviour.
Try
CREATE TABLE IF
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #71 from swatilodh...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Richard Mortimer from comment #69)
> First step to resolve this has to be to add UNIQUE(name, pid) to the MySQL
> version of the Tags table (around line 1056 in dbconfig.xml.cmake).
>
> That
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #70 from e.longuem...@laposte.net ---
Hello,
I still use digikam 3.5 with mysql.
As I don't write tags to pictures, only mysql support, I have had never again a
double _digikam_root_tag.
Exception : importing some images that aren't mine
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
Richard Mortimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
--- Comment #68 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Yes, it is. Look in Mysql DB schema :
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283323
swatilodh...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||swatilodh...@gmail.com
--- Comment #67
46 matches
Mail list logo