[valgrind] [Bug 353370] RDRAND amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x48 0xF 0xC7 0xF0 0x72 0x4 0xFF 0xC9

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370 --- Comment #29 from Cyp --- It is now. And seems to work, thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 353370] RDRAND amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x48 0xF 0xC7 0xF0 0x72 0x4 0xFF 0xC9

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370 --- Comment #28 from Tom Hughes --- That latest change isn't actually committed yet ;-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 353370] RDRAND amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x48 0xF 0xC7 0xF0 0x72 0x4 0xFF 0xC9

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370 --- Comment #27 from Julian Seward --- That doesn't invalidate Tom's comment though: you should always test with CPUID at run time for the presence of any particular instruction set extension, before using it. Especially for recent or obscure

[valgrind] [Bug 353370] RDRAND amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x48 0xF 0xC7 0xF0 0x72 0x4 0xFF 0xC9

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370 --- Comment #26 from Julian Seward --- (In reply to Tom Hughes from comment #25) > So actually there is a later commit which does actually implement RDRAND but > only for AVX2 capable CPUs which yours is not. I think Mark just fixed it to work on

[valgrind] [Bug 353370] RDRAND amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x48 0xF 0xC7 0xF0 0x72 0x4 0xFF 0xC9

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370 --- Comment #25 from Tom Hughes --- So actually there is a later commit which does actually implement RDRAND but only for AVX2 capable CPUs which yours is not. My other point remains correct, that we won't advertise RDRAND on any machine where we

[valgrind] [Bug 353370] RDRAND amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x48 0xF 0xC7 0xF0 0x72 0x4 0xFF 0xC9

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370 --- Comment #24 from Tom Hughes --- That's badly written - they are not supported but this bug is resolved by making valgrind's emulation of the cpuid instruction remove the bit which claims support for them. So an application which tests for rdrand

[valgrind] [Bug 353370] RDRAND amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x48 0xF 0xC7 0xF0 0x72 0x4 0xFF 0xC9

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370 Cyp changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cyp...@gmail.com --- Comment #23 from Cyp --- I'm

[valgrind] [Bug 353370] RDRAND amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x48 0xF 0xC7 0xF0 0x72 0x4 0xFF 0xC9

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||for...@prenav.com --- Comment #22 from Mark

[valgrind] [Bug 353370] RDRAND amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x48 0xF 0xC7 0xF0 0x72 0x4 0xFF 0xC9

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sebastian.groth@enervision.

[valgrind] [Bug 353370] RDRAND amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x48 0xF 0xC7 0xF0 0x72 0x4 0xFF 0xC9

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cj-...@zougloub.eu --- Comment #20 from Tom

[valgrind] [Bug 353370] RDRAND amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x48 0xF 0xC7 0xF0 0x72 0x4 0xFF 0xC9

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mathias.cabiochdelalande@gm

[valgrind] [Bug 353370] RDRAND amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x48 0xF 0xC7 0xF0 0x72 0x4 0xFF 0xC9

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370 danilo.borq...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danilo.borq...@gmail.com -- You are

[valgrind] [Bug 353370] RDRAND amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x48 0xF 0xC7 0xF0 0x72 0x4 0xFF 0xC9

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ezy...@mit.edu --- Comment #18

[valgrind] [Bug 353370] RDRAND amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x48 0xF 0xC7 0xF0 0x72 0x4 0xFF 0xC9

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc.h...@gmail.com --- Comment

[valgrind] [Bug 353370] RDRAND amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x48 0xF 0xC7 0xF0 0x72 0x4 0xFF 0xC9

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juliusde...@gmail.com ---

[valgrind] [Bug 353370] RDRAND amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x48 0xF 0xC7 0xF0 0x72 0x4 0xFF 0xC9

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cochamb...@tycoint.com ---

[valgrind] [Bug 353370] RDRAND amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x48 0xF 0xC7 0xF0 0x72 0x4 0xFF 0xC9

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370 Julian Seward changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@kinomoto.me --- Comment

[valgrind] [Bug 353370] RDRAND amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x48 0xF 0xC7 0xF0 0x72 0x4 0xFF 0xC9

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||brat...@opera.com --- Comment

[valgrind] [Bug 353370] RDRAND amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x48 0xF 0xC7 0xF0 0x72 0x4 0xFF 0xC9

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||miabr...@gmail.com ---