https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361615
--- Comment #13 from earl_c...@yahoo.com ---
Created attachment 101149
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=101149=edit
Standalone test case
I could not find the previously mentioned standalone test case, so I've
uploaded a reconstructed
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361615
--- Comment #12 from Ben Cooksley ---
The content of attachment 100145 has been deleted for the following reason:
Removing non-relevant content
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361615
--- Comment #11 from earl_c...@yahoo.com ---
(In reply to Ivo Raisr from comment #10)
> As Philippe pointed out, there is a problem with the existing attachment.
> Please have a look what is there inside and re-attach.
Yes, that's obviously wrong. Let
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361615
--- Comment #10 from Ivo Raisr ---
As Philippe pointed out, there is a problem with the existing attachment.
Please have a look what is there inside and re-attach.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361615
--- Comment #9 from earl_c...@yahoo.com ---
Comment on attachment 100145
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=100145
Self contained test case
.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361615
--- Comment #8 from Philippe Waroquiers ---
(In reply to earl_chew from comment #4)
> Created attachment 100145 [details]
> Self contained test case
It seems there was an attachment problem.
Could you re-attach the self
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361615
--- Comment #7 from Philippe Waroquiers ---
(In reply to Julian Seward from comment #6)
> Philippe, didn't you fix something like this recently?
Not recently.
Related to thread termination, I did something some years ago,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361615
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||philippe.waroquiers@skynet.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361615
--- Comment #5 from earl_c...@yahoo.com ---
I compiled and ran the submitted test case both with and without valgrind. This
shows that under valgrind, the child process terminates with SIGKILL rather
than the expected SIGTERM.
$ gcc -o test test.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361615
--- Comment #4 from earl_c...@yahoo.com ---
Created attachment 100145
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=100145=edit
Self contained test case
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361615
--- Comment #3 from earl_c...@yahoo.com ---
(In reply to Julian Seward from comment #2)
> Do you have a small test case which demonstrates that Valgrind's behaviour at
> present, differs from when the program is run "natively" ?
In the bug description,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361615
--- Comment #2 from Julian Seward ---
Do you have a small test case which demonstrates that Valgrind's behaviour at
present, differs from when the program is run "natively" ? I'd be happier
about
this if you have something directly
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361615
Ivo Raisr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iv...@ivosh.net
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361615
--- Comment #1 from earl_c...@yahoo.com ---
Created attachment 98326
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=98326=edit
Candidate patch to propagate termination signal
Here is an attempt to propagate the signal that terminates a thread into the
14 matches
Mail list logo