> As a result I'll rescind my idea to slow down Frameworks feature
> releases.
Then I'll take over and fight for it!
>that having a fast Frameworks release cycle allows
> people developing apps with features in Frameworks to not have to live
> on master like we do in Plasma.
That was the
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 2:29 PM Nate Graham wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/22/24 19:19, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El dilluns, 22 d’abril del 2024, a les 17:12:46 (CEST), Nate Graham va
> > escriure:
> >> Now, let's say we make Gear use Plasma's current release schedule by
> >> syncing up the feature
On 4/22/24 19:19, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El dilluns, 22 d’abril del 2024, a les 17:12:46 (CEST), Nate Graham va
escriure:
Now, let's say we make Gear use Plasma's current release schedule by
syncing up the feature releases and adopting the Fibonacci bugfix
releases. If we don't end up
Hello,
On Monday 22 April 2024 18:08:04 CEST Carl Schwan wrote:
> On Friday, April 19, 2024 6:39:01 PM GMT+2 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > Unsurprisingly I'll be pretty much aligned with Luigi, Sune and Volker
> > here I think. I'll try to add a couple of extra aspects to feed the
> > thinking on this
El dilluns, 22 d’abril del 2024, a les 17:12:46 (CEST), Nate Graham va
escriure:
> Ok, so happily I actually see quite a bit of agreement here, regardless
> of what else we do.
>
> 1. Fibonacci bugfix releases are good, and we could benefit from having
> Gear adopt these.
>
> 2. Severing
On Friday, April 19, 2024 6:39:01 PM GMT+2 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Unsurprisingly I'll be pretty much aligned with Luigi, Sune and Volker here
> I think. I'll try to add a couple of extra aspects to feed the thinking on
> this topic.
Thanks you all for raising some important points.
Ok, so happily I actually see quite a bit of agreement here, regardless
of what else we do.
1. Fibonacci bugfix releases are good, and we could benefit from having
Gear adopt these.
2. Severing implicit dependencies is a good idea. Shared libraries in
Gear are especially problematic and
>> in that event I'd like for us to put it
>> to a formal KDE e.V. vote
> Is this an eV topic?
Yes and no.
The original decision had a big impact, changing things again will
have a big impact. It's not something that should be decided by a few
people, nor is it something that should be decided
