---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111585/
---
(Updated July 21, 2013, 6:05 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs and David
On Sonntag, 21. Juli 2013 05:04:10 CEST, Michael Pyne wrote:
On Fri, July 19, 2013 00:21:21 David Faure wrote:
After more live discussion with Sebas and Marco plus Aaron over a video
chat, we came up with the following setup for the workspace repos (*) :
Adding a similar generic selection for
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Thomas Lübking
thomas.luebk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sonntag, 21. Juli 2013 05:04:10 CEST, Michael Pyne wrote:
On Fri, July 19, 2013 00:21:21 David Faure wrote:
After more live discussion with Sebas and Marco plus Aaron over a video
chat, we came up with the
On Sonntag, 21. Juli 2013 11:15:29 CEST, Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Thomas Lübking
thomas.luebk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sonntag, 21. Juli 2013 05:04:10 CEST, Michael Pyne wrote:
On Fri, July 19, 2013 00:21:21 David Faure wrote: ...
git symbolic-ref refs/heads/NEXT
Hi,
during one of the KF5 BoFs at Akademy we discussed which compilers we want to
support for KF5 (for KDE PIM: s/KF5/Akonadi =1.11/). The conclusion was to do
what Qt does (http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.0/qtdoc/platform-details.html)
but ignore the older optional platforms (some of which are
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Thomas Lübking
thomas.luebk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sonntag, 21. Juli 2013 11:15:29 CEST, Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Thomas Lübking
thomas.luebk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sonntag, 21. Juli 2013 05:04:10 CEST, Michael Pyne wrote:
On
Volker Krause wrote:
- GCC = 4.5
- override
Explicit virtual overrides require g++ 4.7:
http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html
This is trivially to work around by a CMake time check and then just define
override to empty.
Eike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
This is trivially to work around by a CMake time check and then just define
override to empty.
Yes, similarly can be done for the nullptr.
Cheerio,
Ivan
--
While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words
Dying to believe in what you heard
I was staring straight into the shining sun
On Sunday 21 July 2013 13:52:06 Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Volker Krause wrote:
- GCC = 4.5
- override
Explicit virtual overrides require g++ 4.7:
http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html
you are right, it's also what all other sources referenced in
On Sunday 21 July 2013 13:52:06 Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Volker Krause wrote:
- GCC = 4.5
- override
Explicit virtual overrides require g++ 4.7:
http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html
This is trivially to work around by a CMake time check and then just define
override to empty.
Not
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111626/
---
Review request for Amarok, kdelibs and Solid.
Description
---
Am Sonntag, 21. Juli 2013, 14:11:07 schrieb Volker Krause:
On Sunday 21 July 2013 13:52:06 Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Volker Krause wrote:
- GCC = 4.5
- override
Explicit virtual overrides require g++ 4.7:
http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html
you are right, it's also what
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111585/#review36244
---
Ship it!
Ah, now I understand. Before hitting Undo, the user
On Saturday, July 20, 2013 10:10:11 David Faure wrote:
On Saturday 20 July 2013 13:28:47 Ben Cooksley wrote:
I'd also be inclined to think of kde-runtime as part of kdelibs,
rather than the workspace
Yes, that is very true. Especially since the plan for most of kde-runtime
is to fold it
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111633/#review36261
---
Is that qt change really needed? Otherwise we are a bit past
On July 21, 2013, 4:47 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Is that qt change really needed? Otherwise we are a bit past the dependency
freeze
CMakeLists.txt already requires Qt 4.8.0.
- Christoph
---
This is an automatically generated
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111585/
---
(Updated July 21, 2013, 6:32 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111585/#review36267
---
This review has been submitted with commit
On domingo, 21 de julho de 2013 14.45.52, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
I totally agree with that. As I said: detection of this is trivial at CMake
time, maybe I get my C++ feature detection package ready even to be
included in 2.8.12, and if not the stuff can easily be extracted. And
afterwards you
On July 21, 2013, 4:47 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Is that qt change really needed? Otherwise we are a bit past the dependency
freeze
Christoph Feck wrote:
CMakeLists.txt already requires Qt 4.8.0.
Albert Astals Cid wrote:
But isn't the content of CMakeLists.txt for
20 matches
Mail list logo
