Hi,
I've been asked by Richard Hughes from Gnome and Fedora to raise the
profile of using AppData metadata within KDE. I know very little
about this area myself, but thought it was worthwhile raising on the
list for discussion. If you have any questions about AppData then
Richard would be happy
On 2 November 2013 09:27, John Layt jl...@kde.org wrote:
The new Gnome Software
Centre in Gnome 3.12 which uses AppData will become the default
installer in Fedora 20 for Gnome (Fedora KDE will use Apper).
Slight correction. We're shipping gnome-software 3.10.x in Fedora 20,
3.12.x in Fedora
Okay... Couple of questions:
* screenshot: which theme/color scheme should be used (btw, for Krita, on
Gnome3, Plastique is hard-coded, because other themes are broken.)
* license: is that the license of the appdata file or of the application?
* How much of marketing and how much of dry
On Saturday, November 2, 2013 09:27:18 John Layt wrote:
One obvious question is how this might relate to Bodega if KDE chooses
to switch to that?
The same files could be used to generate asset descriptions for use with
Bodega.
What does Gnome shipping their own official App
Store mean for
2013/11/2 Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org:
On Saturday, November 2, 2013 09:27:18 John Layt wrote:
One obvious question is how this might relate to Bodega if KDE chooses
to switch to that?
The same files could be used to generate asset descriptions for use with
Bodega.
What does Gnome
On Saturday, November 2, 2013 14:35:10 Matthias Klumpp wrote:
OCS is, generally, horribly designed. I am even hesitant to use the word
‘design’ in combination with OCS. It is really that bad, and why we did
not
use it for Bodega.
I agree with that, and this is the reason why I currently
On 2 November 2013 11:00, Yuri Chornoivan yurc...@ukr.net wrote:
1. AppData files are tailored for intltool/its-tool processing (tags with
underscores). What do you think about adding untranslatable by design appdata
files like it was done for Audacity [1]?
Well, this is fine if you speak
2013/11/2 Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com:
On 2 November 2013 11:00, Yuri Chornoivan yurc...@ukr.net wrote:
1. AppData files are tailored for intltool/its-tool processing (tags with
underscores). What do you think about adding untranslatable by design
appdata files like it was done for
On 2 November 2013 14:34, Matthias Klumpp matth...@tenstral.net wrote:
Yes, scripty could do that. It would make the files less readable an
probably very huge, but it is certainly possible. I could imagine
allowing PO files as translation sources, which are referenced from
the XML, as long as
On 2 November 2013 09:50, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
https://github.com/hughsie/appdata-tools/issues/7 and I'd be very open
to spec improvement ideas.
Apologies for replying to my own mail, but I forgot to mention the
appdata-tools repo[1] which has the appdata-validate command.
On Saturday 02 November 2013 14:37:02 Richard Hughes wrote:
Well, I've not done any technical review of the OCS code, but in
Fedora I've chosen to use fedora-tagger for ratings and comments. It's
not hardcoded and I'd be open to doing something else.
I have worked with OCS in the past on a
On 2 November 2013 15:10, Yuri Chornoivan yurc...@ukr.net wrote:
Depends on the format, have you got any examples of what it looks like?
An example attached.
Well, strong isn't a recognised tag (See
http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/appdata/#description) but
using xml:lang=foo is
On Saturday 02 November 2013 12:53:14 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
Okay... Couple of questions:
* screenshot: which theme/color scheme should be used (btw, for Krita, on
Gnome3, Plastique is hard-coded, because other themes are broken.)
You want to sell your app to the user: use what makes it look
On Sat, 2 Nov 2013, Martin Graesslin wrote:
On Saturday 02 November 2013 12:53:14 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
Okay... Couple of questions:
* screenshot: which theme/color scheme should be used (btw, for Krita, on
Gnome3, Plastique is hard-coded, because other themes are broken.)
You want to sell
On Oct. 31, 2013, 2:41 p.m., Frank Reininghaus wrote:
I see now that I have tried to put too much stuff into a single patch -
it's too hard to digest and to understand, and the number of possibilities
to modify different aspects of UDSEntry in a different way is just too
large for me
On Saturday, November 02, 2013 12:15:15 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Hi, yesterday i was talking with someone about the desktop file class we have
in KDE, he tried to find its api by going to
api.kde.org
and typing
desktop
in the Search bar.
If you do that
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113342/
---
(Updated Nov. 2, 2013, 6:48 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
El Dissabte, 2 de novembre de 2013, a les 09:27:18, John Layt va escriure:
Some recent developments make this a fairly high priority for apps
that wish to target a cross-desktop audience. The new Gnome Software
Centre in Gnome 3.12 which uses AppData will become the default
installer in
El Dissabte, 2 de novembre de 2013, a les 12:59:00, Allen Winter va escriure:
On Saturday, November 02, 2013 12:15:15 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Hi, yesterday i was talking with someone about the desktop file class we
have in KDE, he tried to find its api by going to
api.kde.org
On 2 November 2013 19:33, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
What's the point in having an installer that hides more than half of the apps
in the world that don't ship a file that is not a standard and doesn't seem to
me it was developed as a standard? How is this useful to the end user?
On Saturday 02 November 2013 19:48:01 Richard Hughes wrote:
On 2 November 2013 19:33, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
What's the point in having an installer that hides more than half of the
apps in the world that don't ship a file that is not a standard and
doesn't seem to me it was
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 November 2013 19:33, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
What's the point in having an installer that hides more than half of the apps
in the world that don't ship a file that is not a standard and doesn't seem
On 2 November 2013 20:00, Harald Sitter sit...@kde.org wrote:
We want to showcase high quality applications with active upstream
maintainers.
Who's doing the quality review?
Well, if an upstream ships a valid .desktop file and a valid AppData
file then that's a good indication it's at least
On Saturday 02 November 2013 20:05:11 Richard Hughes wrote:
Who's doing the quality review?
Well, if an upstream ships a valid .desktop file and a valid AppData
file then that's a good indication it's at least alive.
I don't understand that. It's a good indication it's alive right now, but
2013/11/2 Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com:
On 2 November 2013 20:00, Harald Sitter sit...@kde.org wrote:
We want to showcase high quality applications with active upstream
maintainers.
Who's doing the quality review?
Well, if an upstream ships a valid .desktop file and a valid AppData
2013/11/2 Nicolás Alvarez nicolas.alva...@gmail.com:
2013/11/2 Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com:
On 2 November 2013 20:00, Harald Sitter sit...@kde.org wrote:
We want to showcase high quality applications with active upstream
maintainers.
Who's doing the quality review?
Well, if an
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113518/#review42880
---
looks good to me, but please add Oswald Buddenhagen (ossi) to
27 matches
Mail list logo
