Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-17 Thread Sebastian Trüg
On 05/16/2012 10:40 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > Sebastian Trüg wrote: > >> On 05/16/2012 08:23 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: >>> What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff? >>> >>> Or since those are just APIs they can wait. >> >> I say let's postpone them, they are still in kdelibs. >>

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Stephen Kelly
Sebastian Trüg wrote: > On 05/16/2012 08:23 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: >> What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff? >> >> Or since those are just APIs they can wait. > > I say let's postpone them, they are still in kdelibs. > Just so there's no surprises later: all nepomuk stuff

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Sebastian Trüg
On 05/16/2012 09:52 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Sebastian Trüg > wrote: > > > > On 05/16/2012 09:16 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Sebastian Trüg >

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > > > On 05/16/2012 09:16 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Sebastian Trüg > > wrote: > > > > Pushed my stuff to branch "feature/nepomuk2Includes". > > > > Feel free to imple

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Sebastian Trüg
On 05/16/2012 09:16 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Sebastian Trüg > wrote: > > Pushed my stuff to branch "feature/nepomuk2Includes". > > Feel free to implement Ivan's fancier solution. In that case my branch > might at least

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > Pushed my stuff to branch "feature/nepomuk2Includes". > > Feel free to implement Ivan's fancier solution. In that case my branch > might at least help in finding the places where stuff needs replacing. > If you do not I would appreciate a

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Sebastian Trüg
Pushed my stuff to branch "feature/nepomuk2Includes". Feel free to implement Ivan's fancier solution. In that case my branch might at least help in finding the places where stuff needs replacing. If you do not I would appreciate a look over my branch to check if I missed sth. Cheers, Sebastian O

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Sebastian Trüg
On 05/16/2012 08:37 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Sebastian Trüg > wrote: > > On 05/16/2012 08:23 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff? > > > > Or since those are just APIs

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > On 05/16/2012 08:23 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff? > > > > Or since those are just APIs they can wait. > > I say let's postpone them, they are still in kdelibs. > The facets are qu

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Sebastian Trüg
On 05/16/2012 08:23 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff? > > Or since those are just APIs they can wait. I say let's postpone them, they are still in kdelibs. The facets are quite weird and I am not sure about releasing them again. The ui stuff -

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Vishesh Handa
What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff? Or since those are just APIs they can wait. On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > I now prepared the required repositories: > > scratch/trueg/nepomuk-kde-kio > contains the 3 Nepomuk kio slaves > > scratch/trueg/nep

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Sebastian Trüg
I now prepared the required repositories: scratch/trueg/nepomuk-kde-kio contains the 3 Nepomuk kio slaves scratch/trueg/nepomuk-kde-config contains the KCM and the controller systray app The question is: where should we move them? Something like "KDE/Base"? I suppose questions like these hav

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-11 Thread Sebastian Trüg
Just as a reminder: most of the issues were already discussed and decided on: http://community.kde.org/Projects/Nepomuk/Irc_meeting_nepomuk_frameworks On 05/11/2012 09:35 AM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Sebastian Trüg > wrote: > > Sounds

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-11 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > Sounds great. However, it requires one more step: > > Create the new repositories we decided on a while ago for the kcm, the > kio slaves and such. This basically means to do "git filter-branch"[1] > as I did for nepomuk-core. > Have fun

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-03 Thread Sebastian Trüg
nepomuk-core depends on kdelibs. So kdelibs cannot depend on nepomuk-core. We would have to get rid of those dependencies in kdelibs. But that should not be too hard. On 05/03/2012 11:21 AM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > I just noticed that this discussion is no longer cced to kcd. > > On Thu, May 3, 20

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-03 Thread Vishesh Handa
I just noticed that this discussion is no longer cced to kcd. On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Christian Mollekopf wrote: > > > On Thu, May 3, 2012, at 02:22 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Christian Mollekopf > wrote: > > > On Thursday 03 May 2012 00.32:37 Vish