[...]
> SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> sounds like a great idea for default default CMakeLists.txt header
Hi, actually we already have that statement in our KDE licensing policy [1]
since several years that CMake files shall be licensed under BSD. The policy
defaults to BSD-2-Clause
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 6:50 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>
> +1 a
> SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> sounds like a great idea for default default CMakeLists.txt header
>
> Cheers,
> Albert
>
+1. Based on some discussion quite a while ago on Matrix/IRC we went
with BSD-2-Clause for
El dimecres, 24 de juny de 2020, a les 15:23:31 CEST, Harald Sitter va escriure:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:27 PM Elvis Angelaccio
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was wondering, is there a reason why our CMakeLists.txt files often do
> > not contain a license?
>
> The majority are probably
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:27 PM Elvis Angelaccio
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering, is there a reason why our CMakeLists.txt files often do
> not contain a license?
The majority are probably trivial works that nobody can really claim
copyright on and to that end cannot extend a license either.
Hi,
I was wondering, is there a reason why our CMakeLists.txt files often do
not contain a license?
Shouldn't they have one? Or at least the CMakeLists.txt files that are
"big" enough?
Thanks.
Cheers,
Elvis
