On 2021-06-05 21:07, Kevin Ottens wrote:
Hello,
On Saturday, 5 June 2021 17:51:18 CEST David Faure wrote:
On samedi 5 juin 2021 16:29:10 CEST Volker Krause wrote:
> Do KIO slaves still need the klauncher/kinit loading mechanism?
No. My request for developers to test KIO_FORK_SLAVES=1
for
Hello,
On Saturday, 5 June 2021 22:01:54 CEST David Faure wrote:
> On samedi 5 juin 2021 21:07:39 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > On Saturday, 5 June 2021 17:51:18 CEST David Faure wrote:
> > > On samedi 5 juin 2021 16:29:10 CEST Volker Krause wrote:
> > > > Do KIO slaves still need the
On samedi 5 juin 2021 21:07:39 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Saturday, 5 June 2021 17:51:18 CEST David Faure wrote:
> > On samedi 5 juin 2021 16:29:10 CEST Volker Krause wrote:
> > > Do KIO slaves still need the klauncher/kinit loading mechanism?
> >
> > No. My request for developers
Hello,
On Saturday, 5 June 2021 17:51:18 CEST David Faure wrote:
> On samedi 5 juin 2021 16:29:10 CEST Volker Krause wrote:
> > Do KIO slaves still need the klauncher/kinit loading mechanism?
>
> No. My request for developers to test KIO_FORK_SLAVES=1
> for daily use is so that apps fork kio
On Saturday, 5 June 2021 17:51:18 CEST David Faure wrote:
> On samedi 5 juin 2021 16:29:10 CEST Volker Krause wrote:
> > Do KIO slaves still need the klauncher/kinit loading mechanism?
>
> No. My request for developers to test KIO_FORK_SLAVES=1
> for daily use is so that apps fork kio worker
On samedi 5 juin 2021 16:29:10 CEST Volker Krause wrote:
> Do KIO slaves still need the klauncher/kinit loading mechanism?
No. My request for developers to test KIO_FORK_SLAVES=1
for daily use is so that apps fork kio worker processes directly, without going
via klauncher/kinit.
BTW it seems to
