https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340813
--- Comment #11 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Yay! Thank you, Dan! Would you backport this to 16.08 as well?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367892
--- Comment #4 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Hello Daniel. I am talking about the visible response in KMail. I did not check
if there is something happening on the IMAP server. For IMAP, in company with
Exchange, but I also tested
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #30 from Martin Steigerwald ---
I just created
Bug 367892 - During folder synchronisation Akonadi blocks out other operations
like deleting or viewing mails
for blocking out other operations during folder
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367892
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
Ever
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367892
Bug ID: 367892
Summary: During folder synchronisation Akonadi blocks out other
operations like deleting or viewing mails
Product: Akonadi
Version: 16.04
Platform: Debian unstable
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279380
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |UNMAINTAINED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307064
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |UNMAINTAINED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334216
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
This still happens with KMail/Akonadi 16.04. Its not nearly as annoying as
Akonadi maildir resource is much faster now on synchronisation folders. Its
still synchronizing although it
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334209
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334206
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334206
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #29 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Okay, nope changing the title on the bug report I mentioned on the third issue
doesn´t make sense. I don´t see this bug anymore since performance improvements
made by Dan and Millian. It
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #28 from Martin Steigerwald ---
There seem to be three issues in what you observe:
1) There is folder synchronisation when you enter a folder and click mails in
there to read them. I don´t have that and for me this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #27 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 100801
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=100801=edit
excerpt of query log for folder synchronisation after deleting mails
I sometimes need to delete quite a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #26 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 100800
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=100800=edit
excerpt of query log, clicking mails in open folders for some seconds
This is what is almost instant on
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #25 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Okay, I seriously don´t get why its so different for you: One folder with about
1 mails about one second with cold caches and one with more than 24000
mails about 2-3 seconds with
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #23 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Hmmm, okay, now I notice there is an important difference. I tested this
against a local maildir resource, not with IMAP. I think… I bet that may cause
a difference in MySQL load. Do you
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #22 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Gunther, I am not sure what is going on on your system, cause when I access a
76000 mails folder it takes about 8 seconds to actually see KMail showing the
first mails and starting the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #19 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Gunter, how big is your sent folder? How many mails are in there.
And, I am not sure whether it has been mentioned already, but my better
experience may (!) be related to some manual
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367708
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[Exchange 2013] Error on|[Exchange
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367708
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
I intend to try to access Exchange server directly instead of by proxy to
determine whether its a proxy issue.
I also created IMAP log. Here is what I think the relevant excerpt
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367708
Bug ID: 367708
Summary: [Exchange 2013] Error on saving sent mail to IMAP
folder: A07 BAD Command Argument Error. 12
Product: Akonadi
Version: 16.04
Platform: Debian unstable
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364114
--- Comment #5 from Martin Steigerwald ---
https://phabricator.kde.org/T630
is somewhat related.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170425
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316107
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |REOPENED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364114
--- Comment #4 from Martin Steigerwald ---
I see how it is challenging to solve this within current Akonadi design. If
using a folder ID that is just stored within the database, it won´t detect
manual moves. But well, it could
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364114
--- Comment #3 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Okay, it took about 10 minutes and several GiB of disk traffic, but it seems it
is now done. Folders at their new location do not yet display amount of unread
mails and I expect Akonadi to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364114
--- Comment #2 from Martin Steigerwald ---
And yeah, I bet I know what its doing: Its removing all the stale mails entries
from the mysqld database and then adding them again at the new location. Also
KMail still showed the folders
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364114
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Today I tried to be clever:
- I just stopped Akonadi and waited till it was gone (including mysqld
process).
- Then I manually moved several large folders with LKML mails, one with
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #17 from Martin Steigerwald ---
I am running with 16.04 already, but it was already way faster with 15.12.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #16 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Tore, two things:
1) AFAIK KMail 15.12 neeeds Akonadi 15.12 or at least any *other* Qt 5 based
Akonadi. Akonadi 1.13 to my knowledge is Qt 4 based. So I wonder why it works
at all on
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361588
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Ever
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361588
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |FIXED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354056
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233069
--- Comment #16 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Sad, but understandable Boudewijn. I had data losses myself, but the last has
been a very long time ago. I think Akonadi got much more stable related to data
safety, but I can understand
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336859
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=297858
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290393
--- Comment #5 from Martin Steigerwald ---
If Akonadi behaves similarily as I described in
364114 - moving a folder within one maildir resource is extremely slow and
inefficient
with mbox folders, this may explain quite a lot of
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233069
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364114
Bug ID: 364114
Summary: moving a folder within one maildir resource is
extremely slow and inefficient
Product: Akonadi
Version: 16.04
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290393
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316107
--- Comment #33 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Sudhir, I have no idea what Zoho displays there. I only know zoho.com as a
source for spam that reaches my mailbox so far. I suggest you talk back with
Zoho support on this one. Let us
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311184
--- Comment #8 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Johannes, thank you for the imformation. Please report a new bug tough in order
to have it being free of old and outdated information about an unmaintained
release of KDEPIM.
Also explain
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354400
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361737
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|duplicates values in|slowdown on pop3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361737
--- Comment #22 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Hmmm, no, the times are different. Oh, they have always been, just the same of
each retrieval attempt it seems. I completely missed that all the time cause
they looked all the same, as I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361737
--- Comment #21 from Martin Steigerwald ---
This still happens with Applications/16.04. Since starting Akonadi + KMail
16.04 + setting to leave mail on server for one day it received six mails. This
is the result:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361737
--- Comment #20 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Thanks for the support, Michael. I never was clear on what to put into
branch-group to get the desired result. I somehow managed to have kdesrc-build
to build from an Applications branch.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362699
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362695
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361737
--- Comment #16 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Hi Albert, from reading about branch and branch-group in kdesrc-build doc¹ I do
not get what to tell kdesrc build to build Applications/15.06 for me instead of
master.
In branch-group I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361737
--- Comment #14 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Albert, seenUidTimeList also contains duplicated values, but if its the value
in which it saw the uid in question and it saw them all at the same time, it
may be correct. I don´t know how
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361588
--- Comment #3 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Thank you, Laurent. I plan to do a recompile of KDEPIM once I have a working Qt
5.6 setup. Right now I plan to wait for Debian packages of Qt 5.6.1, hopefully
beginning / mid of May. I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361737
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361737
--- Comment #9 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Hi Laurent, I can´t test it, as I do not have Qt 5.6 on my Debian
Sid/Experimental setup and I gathered that KDEPIM requires it since a week or
so. I do have kdesrc-build and while a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361737
--- Comment #8 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 98669
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=98669=edit
excessive duplicates in akonadi_pop3_resource_0rc
Albert, the duplicates easily get excessive. Here an
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316107
--- Comment #31 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Additionally for "So, can you still reproduce this with KMail from KDEPIM 4.14
and Akonadi 1.13?" I´d update this to KDEPIM + Akonadi 15.12. Please test with
that version as KDEPIM 4 and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316107
--- Comment #30 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Hello Sudhir, read comment #27. I specified what information I ask for there.
Thanks, Martin
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343186
--- Comment #3 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Thanks, David. Together with my MySQL database config optimizations 30 seconds
are indeed enough to cold start KMail + Akonadi. Without the optimization
Akonadi startup takes longer than
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361737
Bug ID: 361737
Summary: duplicates values in SeenUidList and SeenUidTimeList
until it crawls to an halt on saving messages
Product: Akonadi
Version: GIT (master)
Platform: Other
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361590
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 98316
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=98316=edit
there are no navigation buttons next to the other three buttons in the toolbar
In older Akregator versions
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361590
Bug ID: 361590
Summary: navigation buttons missing in internal webbrowser
Product: akregator
Version: GIT (master)
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361588
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 98315
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=98315=edit
This is how Akregator displays text from pro-linux.de
Also affected are Heise Open heise.de/open, as well
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361588
Bug ID: 361588
Summary: Text of articles from certain websites displayed way
too small
Product: akregator
Version: GIT (master)
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360834
--- Comment #6 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Knut, it is safe to remove them (but only the file_lost+found files not
file_db_data!). That Akonadi leaks files in file_db_data which akonadictl fsck
moves to lost+found is a known bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360834
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
Ever
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360834
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344242
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344242
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360834
--- Comment #2 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Oh and Dan later added that "server" actually means any resource, so "server"
could also be a local maildir or calender file or what not.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360834
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Adding link to Dan´s mail in the thread "Akonadictl fsck" on kdepim-users where
he explains this:
https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdepim-users/2016-March/000113.html
Also this report
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339181
--- Comment #18 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Wow, thank you, Dan. I may even test if, if I configure my IMAP account again,
I removed it cause Akonadi was too slow, yet, I found it replaced mysql.conf in
a recent upgrade
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339181
--- Comment #14 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Added a bug report about the no rid, no option to reattempt to push item into
server issue:
Bug 360834 - no mechanism to reattempt to store items without rid (just in db)
into the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360834
Bug ID: 360834
Summary: no mechanism to reattempt to store items without rid
(just in db) into the resource
Product: Akonadi
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339181
--- Comment #13 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Okay, Dan didn´t really confirm the bug, actually there are two bugs: The one
with moving mails from cached IMAP to local folder, the other is generally that
on failures there are items
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339181
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323929
--- Comment #41 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Also please carefully check whether the issue you see is the same as this
issue. I already have the impression that this bug contains more than one
issue. If at doubt, please rather open
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323929
--- Comment #40 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Please retest with most recent KDEPIM + Akonadi 15.12.
It has a ton of performance fixes that are not going to be backported due to
shift from Akonadi from Qt4 to Qt5.
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344163
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358116
--- Comment #5 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Hmmm, I had some crashes when I had KMail running during kdesrc-build. But 117
files – even it at one day I had two copies of KMail run (one for work user,
one for private user)? Well, I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358116
Bug ID: 358116
Summary: messageviewer leaks temporary files with mail parts in
it
Product: kmail2
Version: Git (master)
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358116
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||skna...@kde.org
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358116
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Almost all of the directories still have files in it:
merkaba:/tmp> find -name "*unnamed*" | wc -l
116
However quite some of them are empty:
merkaba:/tmp> find -name "*unnamed*" -empty
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358116
--- Comment #3 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Hm, Laurent, I clicked through some more mails and the count of messageviewer
directories in /tmp didn´t increase:
merkaba:/tmp> ls -ld messageviewer_* | wc -l
117
Hmmm, okay, it does
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358021
Bug ID: 358021
Summary: opens a new tab when clicking on a link in other tab
where before it didn´t
Product: akregator
Version: GIT (master)
Platform: Debian testing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358021
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 96652
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=96652=edit
akregatorrc that triggers the open in new tab always issue
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358021
--- Comment #2 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 96653
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=96653=edit
akregatorrc where clicking in a new link in other tab doesn´t open a new tab
But it then always focuses
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340529
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336581
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
Ever
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356093
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356093
--- Comment #4 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 96160
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=96160=edit
kwatchgnupg.log
It basically restarts gnupg again and again and again as it can´t verify the
signature.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356093
--- Comment #5 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 96161
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=96161=edit
example mail from debian-devel-changes-ml I used for creating kwatchgnupg log
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356093
--- Comment #9 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 96167
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=96167=edit
gpg.conf I used for previous test
may it stumble over keyid-format 0xlong
The config is a recommendation
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356093
--- Comment #10 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 96168
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=96168=edit
dirmngr.conf used for previous test
gnugp is from Debian Sid packages – I don´t know which one KMail is
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356093
--- Comment #11 from Martin Steigerwald ---
In a debugging session together with Sandro we found that messageviewer renders
such a mail okay, but kmail does not check that it already verified the mail,
the verification failed and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310899
--- Comment #18 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Hello Hank, as I am not sure whether your issue has exactly the same cause and
for clarity I suggest you open a new bug about it. Very long bug reports with
ton of comments are time
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=355342
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=355342
Bug ID: 355342
Summary: composer mangles mail text on forwarding or edit as
new
Product: kmail2
Version: Git (master)
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=355342
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 95499
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=95499=edit
kmail composer settings
partly in german, but I think you get the idea at which options are checked
when
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348491
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
Ever
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo