https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
--- Comment #48 from Attila ---
(In reply to Wolfgang Bauer from comment #42)
> (In reply to Attila from comment #41)
> > Firefox can display this e-mail within 2 seconds and I can scroll very
> > smooth through the content by dragging the scrollbar.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
--- Comment #47 from Wolfgang Bauer ---
(In reply to RJVB from comment #45)
> (In reply to Wolfgang Bauer from comment #44)
>
> > I do use QtWebKit with konqueror, and opening large OBS logs (which are just
> > text files) do take a while.
>
> TBH,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
--- Comment #46 from Greg Rivers ---
>From a user perspective, it's more than reasonable to expect KMail to display
large plain text messages as well as other common MUAs do. Rather than using
QtWebEngine to display plain text, shouldn't an efficient
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
--- Comment #45 from RJVB ---
(In reply to Wolfgang Bauer from comment #44)
> I do use QtWebKit with konqueror, and opening large OBS logs (which are just
> text files) do take a while.
TBH, Konqueror is such a multipurpose tool that I have no idea
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
--- Comment #44 from Wolfgang Bauer ---
(In reply to RJVB from comment #43)
> > TBH, I think even QtWebKit would struggle with these large mails
>
> That would be simple to test in konqueror with the webkit backend, or
> Otter-Browser, and the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
--- Comment #43 from RJVB ---
(In reply to Wolfgang Bauer from comment #42)
> Have you tried in Chromium though? (which is what QtWebEngine is based upon)
Current versions of Firefox tend to consume more memory than Chromium - in
fact,I understand
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
--- Comment #42 from Wolfgang Bauer ---
(In reply to Attila from comment #41)
> Firefox can display this e-mail within 2 seconds and I can scroll very
> smooth through the content by dragging the scrollbar.
Have you tried in Chromium though? (which is
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
--- Comment #41 from Attila ---
(In reply to RJVB from comment #39)
> A pure text email of 35Mb is massive too, but eating around 4Gb of RAM for
> that isn't just massive. That's what you meant, right, not 4Mb for
> displaying just the part that fits
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
--- Comment #40 from Rodney Baker ---
It is working for me (plain text emails around 41MB - log files from an
automated backup script), but it is very slow to load the email. The CPU fan
does ramp up slightly when doing so, but at least it loads, and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
--- Comment #39 from RJVB ---
A pure text email of 35Mb is massive too, but eating around 4Gb of RAM for that
isn't just massive. That's what you meant, right, not 4Mb for displaying just
the part that fits in your window (which would seem reasonable)?
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
--- Comment #38 from Attila ---
Additional information:
I have observed the system activity today by opening an ASCII-email by the size
of 35 MB. The application "System Activity" shows me a CPU usage of 13%
(QtWebEngineProcess) and RAM consumption of
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
--- Comment #37 from Attila ---
The bug has not been fixed as far as I can see. KMail 5.15.3 is available for
Fedora 33. It doesn't work when I try to open ASCII-emails larger then 2 MB. I
got ASCII emails from 30 MB up to 55 MB. The system starts to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
Wolfgang Bauer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wba...@tmo.at
--- Comment #36 from Wolfgang
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
Axel Braun changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
--- Comment #34 from Axel Braun ---
Created attachment 134744
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=134744=edit
message not displayed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
--- Comment #33 from Rodney Baker ---
Sorry, it's taken a while for me to be able to verify on my system due to other
issues, but I can confirm it is now working as expected. Thanks for your work -
much appreciated!
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
Wolfgang Bauer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Latest
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
Bug Janitor Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #31 from Bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
--- Comment #30 from Laurent Montel ---
it can be a good idea.
I will look at if it's possible.
it can break encoding for some big email but it's less critical as not be able
to load it I think
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
--- Comment #29 from Rodney Baker ---
So, is it possible to make it conditional i.e. below a certain size threshold,
use the preferred method, but if a message is above that threshold, use the
alternative (working but reverted) method from this patch?
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
Laurent Montel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mon...@kde.org
--- Comment #28 from Laurent
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
--- Comment #27 from Greg Rivers ---
(In reply to Rodney Baker from comment #26)
Confirmed. I see this regression as well.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
Rodney Baker changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.6.0 |5.14.1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387061
Rodney Baker changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Large messages don't|REGRESSION: Large messages
24 matches
Mail list logo
