https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163998
--- Comment #3 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl ---
I understand that those are semi-automatic actions, however I will reply for
one out of ~160 spam I got, just for the record.
If someone really thinks, that I will waste another few days *again
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205246
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163393
--- Comment #8 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2011-12-22 08:29:20
---
It does check it -- on startup. So it forces one workflow.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163393
--- Comment #3 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2011-12-21 10:55:08
---
Let me start by saying, that I consider myself as power user, however I also
help weekend users to run computers, among them -- my Mom.
So first of all, I am a bit
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163393
--- Comment #5 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2011-12-21 19:50:48
---
Just to clarify, I am not against possibility of running wizard, I am against
startup wizard. And again if user is so tech-savvy to install an app, and
configure
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163393
--- Comment #6 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2011-12-21 19:59:17
---
And btw. what do you need configuration in the first place (in case of KMail)?
Sending and getting mail? Then why not adding little check on those two
actions
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53814
--- Comment #24 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2011-11-11 13:53:50
---
So by design KMail users have to sift through scams, pornography, vulgar
content because ... ?
( please note this is not spam filtering issue, it is another level
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170271
--- Comment #6 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2011-08-31 12:36:10
---
Don't accuse ridiculously people at the same sentence as good morning and
people will be polite to you, guaranteed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170271
--- Comment #7 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2011-08-31 15:34:16
---
You should have close it right away without giving any reasons in the first
place -- so many bits would be saved.
Keep doing good job! 2012, year of KDE for sure
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170271
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170271
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=238135
Summary: adding group: missing explicit buttons for
adding/removing items
Product: kaddressbook
Version: unspecified
Platform: openSUSE RPMs
OS/Version: unspecified
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=238136
Summary: adding group: checking the people's name is too strict
policy
Product: kaddressbook
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified
OS/Version: unspecified
Status:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=237542
Summary: sending email is no longer possible
Product: kmail
Version: unspecified
Platform: openSUSE RPMs
OS/Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=237545
Summary: obscure communication with user: show the reason of
the error
Product: kmail
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified
OS/Version: unspecified
Status:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206469
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151842
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160224
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161579
--- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2010-01-17 09:04:58
---
http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-7390
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160224
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Quick search for message|(regression) put the quick
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151842
--- Comment #5 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2010-01-13 18:47:50
---
Would you be so kind and attach a screenshot? I keep Kmail4 offline for purpose
so I don't have any income message. Thank you.
--
Configure bugmail: https
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151981
--- Comment #3 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2010-01-13 18:58:31
---
Single line -- well, it was single line before KMail wrapped it.
About the risk. Computers are made for doing automatic tasks. When I see task
which is essentially
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40
Summary: tabs: let the user change the location of tab to any
folder
Product: kmail
Version: unspecified
Platform: openSUSE RPMs
OS/Version: unspecified
Status:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149496
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149241
--- Comment #4 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2010-01-11 17:31:52
---
I didn't migrate to KDE4 so I cannot tell. It happens only after you fetched
some new mail (for the fetched mail, not the older ones).
--
Configure bugmail: https
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143966
--- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2010-01-06 17:16:38
---
I know it has a border, but it is fixed. User cannot increase the size of the
screen on demand, thus entire size of the window is also limited. The only way
to make
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139244
--- Comment #4 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2010-01-02 14:06:39
---
No, but now I wonder if this should be report for KMail or kdelibs in general,
so every font settings would have font size and line height parameter.
--
Configure
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140946
--- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2010-01-03 08:38:32
---
From user POV it is hard to tell, especially because I only test new KDE, I
don't use it. Maybe let's close it is as worksforme if it didn't happen for
you, and I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139244
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137548
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136740
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118160
--- Comment #7 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-12-24 15:31:35
---
Actually it is worksforme. It is possible to train again classifier by choosing
classify as spam/ham.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52813
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bluedz...@wp.pl
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54864
--- Comment #9 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-12-16 17:25:18
---
a) what if there is no search pane -- find next means find next, not show
search pane, focus, and then find next. The difference is important especially
for small
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214696
Summary: adding attachment: cannot open file with quote in
filename
Product: kmail
Version: unspecified
Platform: openSUSE RPMs
OS/Version: unspecified
Status:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214697
Summary: error while opening/reading file -- do not claim any
fact about existence of a file
Product: kmail
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified
OS/Version: unspecified
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211014
--- Comment #3 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-10-20 08:25:17
---
If Reply behaves like Reply to Author then it will do exactly what you have
quoted,
I know. And much more -- it would reply to author in case of 100% valid posts
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211014
--- Comment #5 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-10-20 13:08:41
---
Properly formed mail -- _with_ reply-to and all.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109069
--- Comment #19 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-10-19 09:30:00
---
Ingo, about 99% -- I mean most of the mail I have are correct one.
Is this ok for ML not to set up reply-to?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211014
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bluedz...@wp.pl
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109069
--- Comment #9 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-10-12 15:23:21
---
And that RFC has a number? I followed the whole discussion and quote or number
never appears.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109069
--- Comment #11 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-10-12 16:18:17
---
Thank you. This RFC is quite clear:
In the absence of the Reply-To: field,
replies SHOULD by default be sent to the mailbox(es) specified in the
From: field
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109069
--- Comment #13 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-10-12 16:35:29
---
Of course. This is the report about the case WHEN the reply-to is missing. So
still I don't get how it is a wontfix.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109069
--- Comment #15 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-10-12 17:13:42
---
Torgny, it is in reverse.
a) RFC does not state KMail should, it shouts SHOULD, so KMail better has
some _really_ good reason to ignore this
b) in 99% cases KMail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109069
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bluedz...@wp.pl
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207877
--- Comment #5 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-09-28 14:51:43
---
Learning how to compile and make patches is on my to do list, so sorry but not
now (yet).
Please take a look:
static const QColor defaultColor[ numColorNames
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202173
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bluedz...@wp.pl
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208120
Summary: html message: switch for dropping colors and layout
Product: kmail
Version: unspecified
Platform: SuSE RPMs
OS/Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: wishlist
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207877
Summary: A18Y: do not use hardcoded values for default (color
scheme incompatibility)
Product: kmail
Version: unspecified
Platform: SuSE RPMs
OS/Version: unspecified
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207877
--- Comment #1 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-09-19 13:59:22
---
It is actually a bug, because KMail does not work correctly with KDE schemes
(the default ones, not customized).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206421
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206469
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206469
Summary: toolbar: mark as ham/spam action -- use separate items
instead of one confusing combo
Product: kmail
Version: unspecified
Platform: SuSE RPMs
OS/Version: unspecified
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206421
Summary: migrating from KDE3 causes loosing sending accounts
settings
Product: kmail
Version: unspecified
Platform: SuSE RPMs
OS/Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205620
Summary: make mark as X part of undo/redo feature
Product: kmail
Version: unspecified
Platform: SuSE RPMs
OS/Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: wishlist
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205248
--- Comment #3 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-08-28 20:48:10
---
Unfortunately it is my eyes only case.
But! If you could put some info in this error dialog (I already reported this
issue) so I (and all users in such case) could pin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163609
--- Comment #21 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-08-26 22:02:53
---
Last time I checked - private.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205242
Summary: import lotus notes messages: summarize the errors
Product: kmail
Version: unspecified
Platform: SuSE RPMs
OS/Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205246
Summary: import lotus notes messages: provide full information
on error
Product: kmail
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified
OS/Version: unspecified
Status:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205248
Summary: import lotus notes messages: cannot import data
Product: kmail
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified
OS/Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205248
--- Comment #1 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-08-26 22:18:10
---
PS. What was imported is actually just a mess, empty messages or with some
random characters.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205253
Summary: find messages (global): double LMB click is not
consistent with open message
Product: kmail
Version: unspecified
Platform: SuSE RPMs
OS/Version: unspecified
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205253
--- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-08-26 23:02:37
---
Yes, true. Btw. in KDE3 Kmail worked correctly (at least for me, because I use
preview mode).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138773
--- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-08-23 21:03:47
---
Thomas, I understand I like it part, but my point is it is usability abuse.
Two-fold: KDE does not work in fall-off mode, second, even at theoretical level
of UI design
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149310
--- Comment #3 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-08-22 08:07:42
---
Martin, and when there is no selection?
But I am not pointing out where the active element went, but the issue it is
not highlighted so the user does not know what
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204625
--- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-08-21 17:48:00
---
/me too agrees, plus ctrl+shift+a could be used for messages (single):
ctrl+a -- selects focused message part, if none, body of the message (w/o
headers)
ctrl+shift
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147815
--- Comment #11 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-08-15 19:05:30
---
I would have to take back other votes for KMail :-) and besides, there are so
many issues and so little developers, that I doubt it changes anything really
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203606
Summary: composing mail: ability to alter entire message
Product: kmail
Version: unspecified
Platform: SuSE RPMs
OS/Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: wishlist
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203511
Summary: disable send pending messages entries when there is
no message pending
Product: knode
Version: unspecified
Platform: SuSE RPMs
OS/Version: unspecified
Status:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203085
Summary: message list option: hide tabbar if only one tab is
present
Product: kmail
Version: unspecified
Platform: SuSE RPMs
OS/Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203088
Summary: cannot select whole message content (ctrl+a)
Product: kmail
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified
OS/Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200684
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bluedz...@wp.pl
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128612
--- Comment #5 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-07-28 10:04:30
---
Nope, because the reports are about different issues.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147815
--- Comment #5 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-07-06 10:30:49
---
Please reopen this report -- after all there are duplicates linked here. There
is still no edit box for direct creating new filter. So the workflow is
unfortunately
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147815
--- Comment #7 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-07-06 12:21:12
---
Not exactly :-) Currently there is search edit box above. My point is to add
edit box for entering the name. So the replace could be immediate.
However the best would
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196352
Summary: filters: custom filters are deleted on dialog-close
because of errors
Product: kmail
Version: unspecified
Platform: SuSE RPMs
OS/Version: unspecified
Status:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137294
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196352
--- Comment #1 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-06-13 17:43:34
---
PS. Current behaviour has an absurd side-effect, when there are no filters, the
default one is created automatically. User clicks ok, filter is deleted, you go
see
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136555
--- Comment #8 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-06-12 16:25:39
---
Rigo, I believe the issue you mention is covered in:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99094
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184508
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166062
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bluedz...@wp.pl
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192855
Summary: add signature of used account for any fetched mail
Product: kmail
Version: unspecified
Platform: SuSE RPMs
OS/Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: wishlist
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192855
--- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-05-16 12:33:10
---
Hmm, I thought of it as rather behaviour for safety reason. It is specialized
true, but all users could benefit from it. And I don't see any penalty except
few more
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192865
Summary: waiting for the reply feature
Product: kmail
Version: unspecified
Platform: SuSE RPMs
OS/Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: wishlist
Priority:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122198
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bluedz...@wp.pl
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177716
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bluedz...@wp.pl
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67845
Maciej Pilichowski bluedz...@wp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bluedz...@wp.pl
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122198
--- Comment #5 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-04-09 21:03:50
---
Please re-close this report as duplicate of:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83339
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150759
--- Comment #4 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-04-07 12:37:31
---
When you are selecting something program should not break selection. So it
should either select more elements or set boundary for selection. In this case
selecting next
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150759
--- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-04-07 12:07:34
---
run kmail
new message
enter to field
type xxx
press home, so the care would be before xxx
press and hold shift
press 3 times right arrow
xxx should be selected
press
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160224
--- Comment #12 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-04-05 17:57:54
---
What icons has to do with this report? The question is -- is the QS switchable
or not. In KDE 4.2.1 it was still non-switchable so this report should still be
opened
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150411
--- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-04-05 18:00:35
---
But you realize you will loose data? Filter, settings, mail are all data and
saying that it is ok to loose some settings because they are not critical is
not really
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150411
--- Comment #4 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-04-05 19:30:34
---
What I'm trying to say is, that there is no bug.
Data loss is always a bug.
The only way to prevent that is, to make the filter dialog a modal popup.
Adding
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160224
--- Comment #14 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-04-05 20:11:43
---
Yes, this QS we are talking about.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160224
--- Comment #16 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-04-05 21:56:27
---
How did you get to this conclusion?
KDE3 -- QS switchable.
KDE4 -- QS non-switchable.
Really, it is progress?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160215
--- Comment #7 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-04-04 12:43:06
---
Reply is mail content dependent action. So you do not decide what it does. In
case of reply to author you decide regardless from where this mail comes from
-- it could
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160224
--- Comment #10 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-04-04 15:04:17
---
Netz -- it long standing regression. This feature was present and now it is not
(*). Regression issues are not wishes.
on kmail 1.11.1 on kde 4.2.1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188457
Summary: knode panics when is not able to connect to the server
Product: knode
Version: unspecified
Platform: SuSE RPMs
OS/Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=186932
--- Comment #5 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-03-15 09:00:29
---
a) it is the aim, not the current state
b) it could be done similar how yast works -- store the composer process id
when editing, then check if such process exists
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=186932
--- Comment #3 from Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins wp pl 2009-03-14 23:37:57
---
Jaime, you mean it should not disappear from folder -- it is deleted right
away, it has been that way since KDE3.
The same applies not only to drafts but to any
1 - 100 of 286 matches
Mail list logo
