https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
Andrew Gaydenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
Denis Kurz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
Alexander Potashev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aspotas...@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #36 from Anders Lund and...@alweb.dk ---
Trying to pay attention today to what happens...
I have a message that was filtered, and correctly moved to spam and marked as
read.
Later this message reappeared in my inbox, now marked as read, and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #37 from Anders Lund and...@alweb.dk ---
Created attachment 74535
-- https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=74535action=edit
Sample filter log
Not sure if this is usable, it looks like everything is fine - but it is not.
Maybe this proves
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #38 from András Manţia aman...@kde.org ---
Can you also get the IMAP log for the case when the filter moves the mail?
export KIMAP_LOGFILE=/tmp/imap.log
akonadictl restart
and then see the imap.log.XXX files.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #39 from S. Burmeister sven.burmeis...@gmx.net ---
Isn't spam emails re-appearing in the inbox a different issue than this bug
report refers to?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #40 from Anders Lund and...@alweb.dk ---
(In reply to comment #39)
Isn't spam emails re-appearing in the inbox a different issue than this bug
report refers to?
Yes. But it can easily be confused, since if a message in inbox looks like it
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
András Manţia aman...@kde.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aman...@kde.org
--- Comment #34
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #35 from Hussam Al-Tayeb hus...@visp.net.lb ---
works for me with 4.9.2 (was broken in the past).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
Anders Lund and...@alweb.dk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||and...@alweb.dk
--- Comment #33
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #31 from Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com ---
(In reply to comment #28)
One of the secondary effects is SPAM, filters doesn't work as expect (And
using spam wizard). With some pop3 accounts. What logs do you want ? .
Shouldn't be hard to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #32 from Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com ---
After a reset seems things are working more or less ...
Some filter rules seems just effective works after, log out and log in a kdm
session.
I don't know if helps or not but also did rm -rf
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
Myriam Schweingruber myr...@kde.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.8 |4.9
--- Comment #30 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #22 from Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com ---
Should be modify to critical bug.
Very critical indeed .
Still have mutil problems in filters on 4.9.2 Fedora 17 .
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #23 from S. Burmeister sven.burmeis...@gmx.net ---
(In reply to comment #22)
Should be modify to critical bug.
Very critical indeed .
Still have mutil problems in filters on 4.9.2 Fedora 17 .
Since people do not supply logs etc. it does
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #24 from Andrew Gaydenko a...@gaydenko.com ---
(In reply to comment #23)
Since people do not supply logs etc...
I have attached the log. It was just ignored.
... it does not seem to be that critical.
Votes say it is critical. For me this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #25 from S. Burmeister sven.burmeis...@gmx.net ---
If something is critical to somebody that somebody is committed to fixing it. I
do not see that commitment. No way to reproduce, no logs, no fixes supplied.
And since you seem to fail to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #26 from Andrew Gaydenko a...@gaydenko.com ---
(In reply to comment #25)
If something is critical to somebody that somebody is committed to fixing
it.
It isn't a fact and it isn't even a tendency. It is your fantasy.
I do not see that
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #27 from S. Burmeister sven.burmeis...@gmx.net ---
(In reply to comment #26)
If you haven't an issue and haven't a decision for others' issue why do you
teach affected users to go? Please, stop trolling. I will not keep the
conversation.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #28 from Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com ---
One of the secondary effects is SPAM, filters doesn't work as expect (And using
spam wizard). With some pop3 accounts. What logs do you want ? . Shouldn't be
hard to replicate since, many people
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #29 from S. Burmeister sven.burmeis...@gmx.net ---
From a dev's email to a mailinglist (today):
I read about the POP3/disconnected IMAP filtering problems.
What I can say I extensively use both and have filters for both. The few
things I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Gaydenko a...@gaydenko.com ---
Is there any real hope the issue will be resolved? (without any claim, just
wonder).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
Myriam Schweingruber myr...@kde.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |4.8
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
András Manţia aman...@kde.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|filtering |Mail Filter Agent
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
Marcelo Sales mmtsa...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mmtsa...@gmail.com
--
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
Graeme Hewson ghew...@wormhole.me.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ghew...@wormhole.me.uk
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
Andrew Gaydenko a...@gaydenko.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.7 |4.8
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
aux...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aux...@yahoo.com
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ser...@serjux.com
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Gaydenko a gaydenko com 2012-03-01 17:12:32 ---
To users with affected KMail: please, don't say me too only. Instead add your
bug's votes also!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
Andrew Gaydenko a...@gaydenko.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |NEW
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Gaydenko a gaydenko com 2012-02-13 02:20:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=68742)
-- (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=68742)
filter log
Somewhere at the end of the log the was situation with messages which were
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #13 from Tobias Koenig tokoe kde org 2012-02-11 08:51:39 ---
Hej,
can you enable the filter log 'Tools - Filter Log Viewer' and attach the log
file to this report, please?
This makes it easier for us to understand what's going on.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
Tobias Koenig to...@kde.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDSINFO
Resolution|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Gaydenko a gaydenko com 2012-02-11 23:53:55 ---
Tobias, I have started the log and will attach it later.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
S. Burmeister sven.burmeis...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sven.burmeis...@gmx.net
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Gaydenko a gaydenko com 2012-02-10 10:10:01 ---
Yes, for me filtering started to work also - unfortunately, some kind of
working only. In particular, bogofilter-related filters sometimes work as
expexted, but sometimes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Gaydenko a gaydenko com 2011-12-14 18:13:42 ---
Allen, thanks for your respecting users' feeling :-) Can we at least hope
akonadi is more robust (does some redesign take place) in 4.8? At this case the
issue can be
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #10 from Hussam Al-Tayeb hussam visp net lb 2011-12-14 18:24:48
---
I'm using akonadi from git master branch. The bug is still there.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Gaydenko a gaydenko com 2011-12-08 13:41:40 ---
The bug still exists in 4.7.4 also.
Why the issue is still UNCONFIRMED?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #6 from Hussam Al-Tayeb hussam visp net lb 2011-12-08 14:02:31
---
Because not every feature of a piece of software is used by many people which
is unfortunate. It leads to bugs not being noticed by a lot of users. In this
case, most
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Gaydenko a gaydenko com 2011-12-08 14:09:22 ---
Hussam, in fact the question is more for the KDE team - you have confirmed the
issue, but the team is still ignoring the confirmation during two months.
--
Configure
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
Allen Winter win...@kde.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Gaydenko a gaydenko com 2011-11-03 03:37:35 ---
The bug still exists in 4.7.3 also. I think there are concurrency pitfalls in
akonadi design.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Gaydenko a gaydenko com 2011-10-13 19:58:10 ---
A little addition. I have dedicated folder - zJunk - as a target folder for
spam handling filter. Sometimes (rather rare, say, 0-3 times a day with hundred
or two received
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
Hussam Al-Tayeb hus...@visp.net.lb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hus...@visp.net.lb
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #1 from Hussam Al-Tayeb hussam visp net lb 2011-10-10 08:36:42
---
ah. I get it now. Bogofilter Check filter works but it doesn't jump to Spam
Handling.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283548
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Gaydenko a gaydenko com 2011-10-10 12:23:25 ---
@developers
Can we already change status from UNCONFIRMED to NEW?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
49 matches
Mail list logo