[kdepimlibs] [Bug 346644] KF5/KMail Performance Bottleneck in Akonadi::StatisticsProxyModel::data(...)

2015-06-04 Thread Andreas Cord-Landwehr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346644 Andreas Cord-Landwehr cordlandw...@kde.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[kdepimlibs] [Bug 346644] KF5/KMail Performance Bottleneck in Akonadi::StatisticsProxyModel::data(...)

2015-05-31 Thread Andreas Cord-Landwehr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346644 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Cord-Landwehr cordlandw...@kde.org --- Possible fix is currently discussed at reviewboard: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123924/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[kdepimlibs] [Bug 346644] KF5/KMail Performance Bottleneck in Akonadi::StatisticsProxyModel::data(...)

2015-05-14 Thread Daniel Vrátil
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346644 --- Comment #8 from Daniel Vrátil dvra...@kde.org --- ...which turns our is not the proper place to fix the bottleneck...:) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___

[kdepimlibs] [Bug 346644] KF5/KMail Performance Bottleneck in Akonadi::StatisticsProxyModel::data(...)

2015-05-14 Thread Daniel Vrátil
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346644 Daniel Vrátil dvra...@kde.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dvra...@kde.org Ever

[kdepimlibs] [Bug 346644] KF5/KMail Performance Bottleneck in Akonadi::StatisticsProxyModel::data(...)

2015-05-14 Thread Daniel Vrátil
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346644 --- Comment #9 from Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com --- Git commit d18a3173144014ec0b19ad8466684d69534351a8 by Dan Vrátil. Committed on 14/05/2015 at 13:06. Pushed by dvratil into branch 'master'. Add the QIcon::fromTheme() workaround to ETM

[kdepimlibs] [Bug 346644] KF5/KMail Performance Bottleneck in Akonadi::StatisticsProxyModel::data(...)

2015-05-09 Thread Andreas Cord-Landwehr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346644 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Cord-Landwehr cordlandw...@kde.org --- There actually happen quite interesting things behind the scenes. Here, my first analysis what happens (all assertions I do below are actually verified): 1) in

[kdepimlibs] [Bug 346644] KF5/KMail Performance Bottleneck in Akonadi::StatisticsProxyModel::data(...)

2015-04-26 Thread Laurent Montel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346644 --- Comment #3 from Laurent Montel mon...@kde.org --- When I read qt code I see that icon is caching QIcon QIcon::fromTheme(const QString name, const QIcon fallback) { QIcon icon; if (qtIconCache()-contains(name)) { icon =

[kdepimlibs] [Bug 346644] KF5/KMail Performance Bottleneck in Akonadi::StatisticsProxyModel::data(...)

2015-04-26 Thread Andreas Cord-Landwehr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346644 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Cord-Landwehr cordlandw...@kde.org --- Maybe this gives some more light on the issue, the paste of the first expanded entries of perf report: https://paste.kde.org/p6oxmvnmr -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[kdepimlibs] [Bug 346644] KF5/KMail Performance Bottleneck in Akonadi::StatisticsProxyModel::data(...)

2015-04-26 Thread Andreas Cord-Landwehr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346644 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Cord-Landwehr cordlandw...@kde.org --- Thanks, if you interested in the perf record, just ping me (though it is ~900MB large) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[kdepimlibs] [Bug 346644] KF5/KMail Performance Bottleneck in Akonadi::StatisticsProxyModel::data(...)

2015-04-26 Thread Laurent Montel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346644 --- Comment #5 from Laurent Montel mon...@kde.org --- Thanks for info. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org

[kdepimlibs] [Bug 346644] KF5/KMail Performance Bottleneck in Akonadi::StatisticsProxyModel::data(...)

2015-04-25 Thread Laurent Montel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346644 Laurent Montel mon...@kde.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mon...@kde.org --- Comment #1