gt; Regards,
>
> Nicolas.
>
>
>
> *De :*Kea-users [mailto:kea-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] *De la part
> de* Chaigneau, Nicolas
> *Envoyé :* mercredi 19 avril 2017 15:33
> *À :* Thomas Markwalder; kea-users@lists.isc.org
> *Objet :* Re: [Kea-users] Wrong values
-users] Wrong values in Kea statistics
Thomas,
I would love to use 1.2 :)
Timing is unfortunate though. We're currently integrating Kea 1.1.0, and we
might not have the time to upgrade to 1.2 when it's available.
If this is the case I'll have to fix the issue on 1.1.0 before we ship. If you
-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: [Kea-users] Wrong values in Kea statistics
Hi Malcom:
1.2 is due 4/28/17.
Cheers,
Thomas
On 4/19/17 8:39 AM, Malcolm Scerri wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for your email. I have just seen the ticket.
Do you have any approximate date when Kea 1.2 will be released please?
, it will be easier :)
Regards,
Nicolas.
De : Thomas Markwalder [mailto:tm...@isc.org]
Envoyé : mercredi 19 avril 2017 15:20
À : Chaigneau, Nicolas; kea-users@lists.isc.org
Objet : Re: [Kea-users] Wrong values in Kea statistics
Hi Nicolas:
It does affect 1.1.0. We can probably make a patch available
> de* Thomas Markwalder
> *Envoyé :* mercredi 19 avril 2017 14:08
> *À :* kea-users@lists.isc.org
> *Objet :* Re: [Kea-users] Wrong values in Kea statistics
>
>
>
> Hello Malcom:
>
> As per my private replies to you, we have identified the issue. As a
> matter
> Thanks and regards,
>
>
>
> Malcolm.
>
>
>
> *From:*Kea-users [mailto:kea-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Thomas Markwalder
> *Sent:* 19 April 2017 14:08
> *To:* kea-users@lists.isc.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Kea-users] Wrong values in Kea st
@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: [Kea-users] Wrong values in Kea statistics
Hello Malcom:
As per my private replies to you, we have identified the issue. As a matter
of expediency, I have created a ticket for your issue:
http://kea.isc.org/ticket/5247#ticket
and we are working into our Kea 1.2
Hello everyone,
I am using Kea socket to obtain statistics per each configured subnet. However,
the value of Assigned addresses is exceeding the value of Total addresses.
This issue is currently occurring on two servers and on multiple subnets and
cannot figure out what might be wrong.
I