Hello,
I'm running kea DHcp6 (version 1.3.0) in my docker machine. For the test, I
am using one machine in Ubuntu 16.04.
DHcpv6 server and test machine are within local LAN.
Now, I want to group users based on user-class option or
vendor-class-identifier. Based on the reading, LAN network, these
Hi,
That's my configuration for option82, it is running on Kea version as 1.1.0
but it does not run Kea version as 1.3.0.
I look logs "reason: subnet with the prefix of '10.0.1.0/24' already
exists", yes it is true but same configuration is running on kea version
1.1.0. How to do same job
Gokulakrishnan Gopalakrishnan writes:
> Currently, I'm hardcoding 'next-server' in kea.conf. Is it possible to do
> it via hook code?
=> yes of course. BTW the way to set the next server address field
(aka siaddr) in BOOTP/DHCP packet is the Pkt4 setSiaddr() method.
Regards
Francis Dupont
"Chaigneau, Nicolas" writes:
> Executing configure with the following option :
>
> --with-log4cplus
>
> (directory which contains < include > and < lib > sub-dirs for Log4cplus)
>
>
> This doesn't seem to work for Kea 1.4.0-beta.
> (It worked with Kea 1.3.0)
=> on which system?
> I get the
"Batuhan BAKIP" writes:
> I look logs "reason: subnet with the prefix of '10.0.1.0/24' already
> exists", yes it is true but same configuration is running on kea version
> 1.1.0. How to do same job on version 1.3.0?
=> the code checking if two subnets are the same is deeply buggy
(known problem
sothy shan writes:
> Now, I want to group users based on user-class option or
> vendor-class-identifier. Based on the reading, LAN network, these are only
> two ways dhcp server to classify users.
=> please use user-class (vendor-class-identifier was not designed to
be used alone).
> Now I am
Hello Francis, thanks for your reply!
My system: RedHat RHEL 7.1 x86_64
Compiler: gcc 7.3.0
I've found more information in config.log as you suggested. The issue was:
/tmp/cczN32aU.o: In function `main':
/home/build/kea-1.4.0-beta/conftest.cpp:34: undefined reference to
"Francis Dupont" writes:
>The simplest is to use the fact the code uses the string itself to compare
subnets so changing slightly it will give what you want.
Thank you, I change my configuration according to your suggestion. It is
useful for me.
-Original Message-
From: Francis Dupont
