Just a foreword, I am experimenting with the class definitions and different
test structures, since the examples provided in the official documentation
are very limited. Specifically, I created these match conditions, and they
seem to work just fine
"client-classes": [
{
Hi Marek,
It looks to me like, in your last screenshot, that option 17 is part
of the solicit message proper rather than the relay portion. It's a
little hard to tell from screenshots.
You can split the classes up for testing (or permanently) so that you
can see exactly what is happening. For
> On Apr 30, 2024, at 9:18 AM, Dan Geist wrote:
>
> Thanks Vicky.
>
> Facebook's dhcplb is an option, but it also solves problems that we don't
> have (imbalance of DHCP messaging and need for staged deployments). It also
> requires more infra (either physical or virtual) and a slightly
Hi Kea-users,
Kea 2.5.8 is posted at https://downloads.isc.org/isc/kea/2.5.8/, but I jumped
the gun a bit, and announced availability before we had built all the packages
and uploaded them to Cloudsmith. So, if you are looking to download Kea 2.5.8,
just wait a few hours, or until tomorrow.
Brendan, we've nothing special with the use of ECMP as it's just the forwarding
decision logic on the spine routers of our datacenter stack. The equal routes
are all still inserted there by BGP announcements from the service nodes...I
think we have a VERY similar setup. Based on what you need
On 4/30/24 9:18 AM, Dan Geist wrote:
Thanks Vicky.
Facebook's dhcplb is an option, but it also solves problems that we
don't have (imbalance of DHCP messaging and need for staged
deployments). It also requires more infra (either physical or virtual)
and a slightly greater network complexity
Thanks Vicky.
Facebook's dhcplb is an option, but it also solves problems that we don't have
(imbalance of DHCP messaging and need for staged deployments). It also requires
more infra (either physical or virtual) and a slightly greater network
complexity which differs from what we already
> On Apr 29, 2024, at 6:16 PM, Dan Geist wrote:
>
> Hi. I have an environment where many of the network services (DNS, NTP, ToD,
> etc.) provide scaling, fault tolerance, and load sharing via ECMP (in front
> of the service) and BGP. Each (of the 2 or more) service node(s) monitors the
>
