From: Benjamin Tissoires on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/777#note_524853105
Thanks for the further digging.
In that case:
Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello,
We ran automated tests on the following kernel build:
Kernel package: kernel-5.11.4-50.fc33
Task URL: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=63345527
The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: PASSED
Tests: OK
From: Gopal Tiwari on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/705#note_524832013
Yeah, I think I did it if I remember correctly.
Acked-by: Gopal Tiwari
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Hello,
We ran automated tests on the following kernel build:
Kernel package: kernel-5.11.4-50.fc33
COPR build ID: 2060604
The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
Tests: FAILED
One or more kernel tests
Hello,
We ran automated tests on the following kernel build:
Kernel package: kernel-5.11.4-50.fc33
COPR build ID: 2060604
The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
Tests: FAILED
One or more kernel tests
Hello,
We ran automated tests on the following kernel build:
Kernel package: kernel-5.11.4-50.fc33
COPR build ID: 2060604
The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: PASSED
Tests: OK
All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are
From: pbrobinson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/777#note_524719258
So s390/powerpc are not using PS2 anywhere. Some *old* PowerPC platforms
had `PC_SERIO` in the POWER4 sort of age, but in Fedora/RHEL we only
support POWER8 or later.
So *old* PowerPC did
From: Vladis Dronov
[redhat] Enable PERCPU_STATS and CRYPTO_DEV_CCP_DEBUGFS in the debug flavor
The same way in was done in the rhbz#1744633 and rhbz#bz1765717.
Signed-off-by: Vladis Dronov
diff a/redhat/configs/common/debug/CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_CCP_DEBUGFS
From: Vladis Dronov
[redhat] Enable CONFIG_PERCPU_STATS in the debug flavor
The same way in was done in the rhbz#1744633.
Signed-off-by: Vladis Dronov
diff a/redhat/configs/common/debug/CONFIG_PERCPU_STATS
b/redhat/configs/common/debug/CONFIG_PERCPU_STATS
--- /dev/null
+++
From: Herton R. Krzesinski on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/953#note_524642135
Ok, I added back rh-configs and fedora-configs and pushed/updated the MR
now, which just call the new ones.
___
kernel mailing list --
From: pbrobinson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/854#note_524618853
Yep, I can, will do it shortly
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/953#note_524611480
It's because 'make rh-configs' is such a common thing to type for us and
we wanted to keep that in place. The other commands 'make rh-brew', for
instance, is well used but is not at
From: Herton R. Krzesinski on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/953#note_524606311
I thought about it, adding extra checks to makefile. But why we have
only rh-configs and fedora-configs differ from the other targets, all
other targets are dist-*, and only
From: Herton R. Krzesinski on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/854#note_524595059
Peter can you rebase this? "[PATCH 5/8] common: Bosch MCAN support for
Intel Elkhart Lake" is not applying anymore, one of the config files
moved.
From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/953#note_524578952
-fedora-configs: FLAVOR = fedora
-fedora-configs: dist-configs
+dist-fedora-configs: FLAVOR = fedora
+dist-fedora-configs: dist-configs
^^^ I know exactly the bug you're trying to
From: Herton R. Krzesinski
redhat: fix and rename fedora-configs and rh-configs targets
Since the rename of all targets to dist-* targets, the specific config
targets for Fedora and RHEL do not work anymore: the makefile filters
only dist-% and distg-% targets, so it doesn't run against
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/922#note_524569661
@ahs3 - can you do a quick sanity check of this conversation and see if
you have any concerns?
___
kernel mailing list --
From: Jeremy Linton on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/884#note_524524247
I've been meaning to re-post that with proper CC's and the like, but
have been off doing coresight stuff, which JCM just killed since marvell
isn't around asking for it anymore.
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/884#note_524518008
@ahs3, @msalter - can you review this?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/856#note_524515957
@ahs3 - can you review this?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/705#note_524515062
@gtiwari1 - can you review this?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/825#note_524514509
@ahs3 - can you review this?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/777#note_524513767
@btissoir - can you review this?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/853#note_524510435
@perexg - Can you review this?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
From: Rafael Aquini on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/949#note_524447285
Acked-by: Rafael Aquini
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
From: Ondrej Mosnáček on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/922#note_524400814
@dzickusrh Yes, I suppose a review/insight form the downstream EFI
maintainers would be useful here.
___
kernel mailing list --
On Tue, 2021-03-02 at 05:26 +, CKI Gitlab (via Email Bridge) wrote:
> From: Fedora Kernel Team
>
> [redhat] New configs in arch/arm64
>
> Hi,
>
> As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
> options need to be reviewed.
>
> As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/922#note_524373324
@omos - who else from RHEL should get involved in this review? The EFI
lockdown kernel folks?
___
kernel mailing list --
From: Ondrej Mosnáček on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/922#note_524364236
Ah, I see... So I should enable CONFIG_SECURITY_LOCKDOWN_LSM=y globally
and also add "lockdown" to the CONFIG_LSM list? Or should it stay
disabled by default, unless the user
From: pbrobinson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/922#note_524345964
So Lockdown LSM is now upstream and it's the vast majority of the
implementation of UEFI secure boot. Then Fedora/ARK has a minor patchset
on top of that for UEFI secure boot. Downstream
From: Ondrej Mosnáček on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/922#note_524338595
I'm not sure if we actually want to have the Lockdown LSM enabled. IIRC,
Fedora/RHEL (or just Fedora?) has some downstream patches that implement
something similar (I think?)...
Hello,
We ran automated tests on the following kernel build:
Kernel package: kernel-5.10.21-200.fc33
Task URL: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=63296118
The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: PASSED
Tests: OK
From: pbrobinson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/922#note_524304568
The BPF LSM patch looks fine, I think the lockdown LSM is incorrect and
needs a review/patch too to move it from Fedora -> common/generic and
enable it.
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 7:09 PM Vladis Dronov (via Email Bridge)
wrote:
>
> From: Vladis Dronov
>
> [redhat] Make CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_QAT_* configs x86-only and unify them
>
> Intel has confirmed that QAT hardware is x86 only. Unify all the related
> configs under
From: pbrobinson on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/952
NOTE: Truncated patchset due to missing @redhat.com email
address on your GitLab profile at https://gitlab.com/-/profile.
Once that is fixed, close and reopen the merge request
35 matches
Mail list logo
