From: Phil Sutter on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1226#note_672685081
Cool, thanks for the review. I updated the RHEL9 MR already to face 9.0-beta
branch. Will rebase this one to only contain the first patch and a new one
disabling the relevant config
From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1226#note_672662871
This looks good to me and matches the rest of the existing messages. If we
need to change these
later on we can make a modification after management approval.
From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1226#note_672566455
@psutter1 -- I just sent you an email :)
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
From: Phil Sutter on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1226#note_672504614
OK, so I created another MR for rhel9 repo, aiming at 'main' branch. Is that
correct @prarit ? Or do we really use a separate tree for beta? There is
9.0-beta but it differs only in
From: Phil Sutter on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1226#note_672477060
I see. So kernel-ark is collecting kernel changes for RHEL10 since RHEL9's
final rebase?
___
kernel mailing list --
From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1226#note_672411585
Hey @psutter1,
Things have progressed since you posted this two months ago. RHEL9 has had
it's final rebase against ARK, and is now it's own tree:
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1375#note_672310552
Correct.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: Phil Sutter on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1226#note_672309013
@prarit, are you OK with the new version?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
From: Vladis Dronov on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1375#note_672292721
indeed, so probably this MR should be made against the C9S tree and not the
ARK one...?
___
kernel mailing list --
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1375#note_672276565
Right, but if it is still staged for rc1, it means that this tree will get it
via Linus Monday morning and there is no need for an MR at all.
From: Bob Peterson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1375#note_672260597
Hi Justin. I think I did something wrong. See comment above:
"The source branch is 12666 commits behind the target branch"
I'm going to close this MR and start over.
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1375#note_672242647
While it looks like this MR needs to be rebased against current os-build (we
rebase the tree after every upstream release), I am wondering if it is even
worth merging. If this is
12 matches
Mail list logo
