On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13118
Subject : iptables very slow after commit
784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49
Submitter : Jeff Chua jeff.chua.li...@gmail.com
Date
* Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
* Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13325
Subject : 2.6.30-rc kills my box hard - and lockdep chains
Submitter : Jonathan Corbet cor...@lwn.net
Date : 2009-05-14 15:49 (3 days old)
References:
2009/5/16 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it
2009/5/16 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12499
Subject : Problem with using bluetooth adaper connected to usb port
Submitter : Maciej Rutecki maciej.rute...@gmail.com
Date : 2009-01-13 18:34 (124 days old)
2009/5/16 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 23:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
Ingo Molnar wrote:
i think this might be fixed by:
381a80e: inotify: use GFP_NOFS in kernel_event() to work around a lockdep
false-positive
already in -rc6.
Haven't seen this issue with rc6.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
On Sunday 17 May 2009, Maciej Rutecki wrote:
2009/5/16 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced
On Sunday 17 May 2009, Sachin Sant wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
i think this might be fixed by:
381a80e: inotify: use GFP_NOFS in kernel_event() to work around a lockdep
false-positive
already in -rc6.
Haven't seen this issue with rc6.
Great, thanks. Bug closed.
Best,
Rafael
--
On Sunday 17 May 2009, Jeff Chua wrote:
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13118
Subject : iptables very slow after commit
784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49
Submitter :
On Sunday 17 May 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 23:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.29. Please
On Sunday 17 May 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13325
Subject : 2.6.30-rc kills my box hard - and lockdep chains
Submitter : Jonathan Corbet cor...@lwn.net
Date:
On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 11:12 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 23:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.29.
On Sunday 17 May 2009, Daniel Bierstedt wrote:
Hello,
as I wrote on 26'th of April:
yes, this bug entry should be listed. This bug prevents people from
using live-cd's or testing the 2.6.29 (if they know about this bug...).
Meanwhile I did some tests with knoppix 6 (2.6.28.4) and the
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday 17 May 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13321
Subject : kernel crash with NULL pointer when boot
Submitter : Martin Bammer mr...@gmx.at
Date
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 09:33:27AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13297
Subject : kernel panic - not syncing : fatel exception in
interupt
Submitter : rob r...@housetosell.net
Date: 2009-05-12 19:34 (5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Richter wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday 17 May 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
Bug-Entry: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13321
Subject: kernel crash with NULL pointer when
* Rafael J. Wysocki (r...@sisk.pl) wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it
* Rafael J. Wysocki (r...@sisk.pl) wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12980
Subject : lockup in X.org
Submitter : Marcus Better mar...@better.se
Date : 2009-03-31 08:58 (47 days old)
Bug went away for
On Sat, 16 May 2009 22:05:58 +0200 (CEST)
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between
Hi,
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 03:32:11PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 09:33:27AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13297
Subject : kernel panic - not syncing : fatel exception in
interupt
Submitter
On Sunday 17 May 2009, Marcus Better wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12980
Subject : lockup in X.org
Submitter : Marcus Better mar...@better.se
Date: 2009-03-31 08:58 (47 days old)
Bug went away for
2009/5/16 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl:
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.29, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed
already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.29, please
On Sat, 16 May 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13122
Subject
On Sunday 17 May 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
Andrew Morton wrote:
Well.. order-1 GFP_ATOMIC allocations are unreliable. The networking
code should hanlde the situation and recover. I assume that is
happening in this case?
Yes, the driver has recovered in all cases so far.
Perhaps we did something in that code after 2.6.29 which
28 matches
Mail list logo
