Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

2009-05-26 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 26 May 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Monday 25 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote: Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.29, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. It may be worth tracking a possible regression

Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

2009-05-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday 26 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote: On Tuesday 26 May 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Monday 25 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote: Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.29, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. It

Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

2009-05-25 Thread Frans Pop
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.29, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. It may be worth tracking a possible regression introduced with -rc6 as a result of http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13259. A new warning

Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

2009-05-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday 25 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote: Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.29, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. It may be worth tracking a possible regression introduced with -rc6 as a result of

Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

2009-05-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday 22 May 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Sat, 16 May 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13329 Subject : cifs_close: NULL pointer dereference Submitter : Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com Date:

Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

2009-05-19 Thread Borislav Petkov
Hi, On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 06:35:28PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: On Sunday 17 May 2009 18:19:16 Borislav Petkov wrote: Hi, On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 03:32:11PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 09:33:27AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: Bug-Entry

Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

2009-05-19 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 06:35:28PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: On Sunday 17 May 2009 18:19:16 Borislav Petkov wrote: Hi, On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 03:32:11PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 09:33:27AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: Bug-Entry :

Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

2009-05-18 Thread Oleg Nesterov
On 05/17, Ingo Molnar wrote: Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13107 Subject : LTP 20080131 causes defunct processes w/2.6.30-rc1 Submitter : Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org Date: 2009-04-09 15:43 (38 days old) First-Bad-Commit:

Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

2009-05-18 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Oleg Nesterov o...@redhat.com wrote: On 05/17, Ingo Molnar wrote: Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13107 Subject : LTP 20080131 causes defunct processes w/2.6.30-rc1 Submitter : Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org Date : 2009-04-09

Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

2009-05-18 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, 18 May 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: Btw., why did the patch (and the revert) make any difference to the test? Timing differences look improbable. It's the change from !signal_group_exit(signal) to !sig_kernel_only(signr) and quite frankly, I still don't see the

Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

2009-05-18 Thread Oleg Nesterov
On 05/18, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Oleg Nesterov o...@redhat.com wrote: On 05/17, Ingo Molnar wrote: Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13107 Subject : LTP 20080131 causes defunct processes w/2.6.30-rc1 Submitter : Kumar Gala

Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

2009-05-18 Thread Oleg Nesterov
On 05/18, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Mon, 18 May 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: Btw., why did the patch (and the revert) make any difference to the test? Timing differences look improbable. It's the change from !signal_group_exit(signal) to !sig_kernel_only(signr) and quite

Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

2009-05-17 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13325 Subject : 2.6.30-rc kills my box hard - and lockdep chains Submitter : Jonathan Corbet cor...@lwn.net Date : 2009-05-14 15:49 (3 days old) References:

Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

2009-05-17 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday 17 May 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13325 Subject : 2.6.30-rc kills my box hard - and lockdep chains Submitter : Jonathan Corbet cor...@lwn.net Date:

Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

2009-05-17 Thread Stefan Richter
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday 17 May 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13321 Subject : kernel crash with NULL pointer when boot Submitter : Martin Bammer mr...@gmx.at Date

Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

2009-05-17 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 09:33:27AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13297 Subject : kernel panic - not syncing : fatel exception in interupt Submitter : rob r...@housetosell.net Date: 2009-05-12 19:34 (5

Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

2009-05-17 Thread Jeff Mahoney
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stefan Richter wrote: Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday 17 May 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: Bug-Entry: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13321 Subject: kernel crash with NULL pointer when

Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

2009-05-17 Thread Borislav Petkov
Hi, On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 03:32:11PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 09:33:27AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13297 Subject : kernel panic - not syncing : fatel exception in interupt Submitter

Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

2009-05-17 Thread Alex Bennee
2009/5/16 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl: This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.29, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of.  If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.29, please

2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

2009-05-16 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.29, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.29, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list.