On 12/21/2011 05:24 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[Evidently, vger has blocked the previous attempts to post this message
for some reason. I wonder why?]
This message contains a list of some regressions from 3.0 and 3.1
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking
On 12/21/2011 05:24 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[Evidently, vger has blocked the previous attempts to post this message
for some reason. I wonder why?]
This message contains a list of some regressions from 3.0 and 3.1
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:28:19 +0530
Srivatsa S. Bhat srivatsa.b...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 12/21/2011 05:24 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[Evidently, vger has blocked the previous attempts to post this message
for some reason. I wonder why?]
This message contains a list of some
On 2011-12-21 00:54 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message contains a list of some regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 for
which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved
On Wed 21-12-11 00:54:46, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Subject: Reiserfs.c bug in 3.2-rc5
Submitter : Jorge Bastos mysql.jo...@decimal.pt
Date : 2011-12-10 23:48
Message-ID : 43556.213.228.140.150.1323560920.squir...@webmail.decimal.pt
References :
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
Subject : Regression: irqpoll hasn't been working for me since March 16
IRQ
Submitter : Edward Donovan edward.dono...@numble.net
Date : 2011-10-19 22:09
Message-ID :
On 12/20/2011 08:31 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
Subject: [BUG] deadlock: jfs (3.2.0-rc4-00154-g8e8da02)
Submitter : Nico Schottelius nico-linux-20111...@schottelius.org
Date : 2011-12-06 10:05
Message-ID :
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Dave Kleikamp dave.kleik...@oracle.com wrote:
I don't think this is a regression. It's been seen before, but the
patch never got submitted, or was lost somewhere. I believe this
will fix it.
Hmm. This patch looks obviously correct. But it looks *so* obviously
From: Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:31:15 -0800
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
Subject : Sparc-32 doesn't work in 3.1.
Submitter : Rob Landley r...@landley.net
Date : 2011-11-12 11:22
Message-ID :
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Dave Kleikamp dave.kleik...@oracle.com
wrote:
I don't think this is a regression. It's been seen before, but the
patch never got submitted, or was lost somewhere. I believe this
will fix it.
Hmm. This patch
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:15:00PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins hu...@google.com
from me (and add_to_page_cache_locked does the masking of inappropriate
bits when passing on down, so no need to worry about that aspect).
I was grepping for possibilities of that hitting
11 matches
Mail list logo
