[Resend] 3.2-rc6+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1

2011-12-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
[Evidently, vger has blocked the previous attempts to post this message for some reason. I wonder why?] This message contains a list of some regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. If any of them have been fixed already, please let us

Re: [Resend] 3.2-rc6+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1

2011-12-20 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: Subject    : Regression: irqpoll hasn't been working for me since March 16 IRQ Submitter  : Edward Donovan edward.dono...@numble.net Date       : 2011-10-19 22:09 Message-ID :

Re: [Resend] 3.2-rc6+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1

2011-12-20 Thread Dave Kleikamp
On 12/20/2011 08:31 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: Subject: [BUG] deadlock: jfs (3.2.0-rc4-00154-g8e8da02) Submitter : Nico Schottelius nico-linux-20111...@schottelius.org Date : 2011-12-06 10:05 Message-ID :

Re: [Resend] 3.2-rc6+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1

2011-12-20 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Dave Kleikamp dave.kleik...@oracle.com wrote: I don't think this is a regression.  It's been seen before, but the patch never got submitted, or was lost somewhere. I believe this will fix it. Hmm. This patch looks obviously correct. But it looks *so* obviously

Re: [Resend] 3.2-rc6+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1

2011-12-20 Thread David Miller
From: Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:31:15 -0800 On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: Subject    : Sparc-32 doesn't work in 3.1. Submitter  : Rob Landley r...@landley.net Date       : 2011-11-12 11:22 Message-ID :

Re: [Resend] 3.2-rc6+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1

2011-12-20 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Dave Kleikamp dave.kleik...@oracle.com wrote: I don't think this is a regression.  It's been seen before, but the patch never got submitted, or was lost somewhere. I believe this will fix it. Hmm. This patch

Re: 3.2-rc6+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1

2011-12-20 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2011.12.21 at 00:54 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Subject: WARNING: at fs/sysfs/sysfs.h:195 (during boot) Submitter : Markus Trippelsdorf markus-xp2qqqlhh3xzoyq+o6r...@public.gmane.org Date : 2011-11-13 19:24 Message-ID :

Re: [Resend] 3.2-rc6+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1

2011-12-20 Thread Al Viro
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:15:00PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote: Acked-by: Hugh Dickins hu...@google.com from me (and add_to_page_cache_locked does the masking of inappropriate bits when passing on down, so no need to worry about that aspect). I was grepping for possibilities of that hitting