Hi,
I know that it's not a typical Linux kernel related query but I reckon
that people involved in Linux kernel testing/development might have
gotten into similar situation. So, please bear with me for this rather
generic framework related query.
The scenario:
1: Cloned linux-next at time T1
$
As others have pointed out, you need 'git rebase' here. With an
interactive rebase, you can cherry-pick what you want to do with each
commit (keep, edit, squash etc). It can also help you apply your
changes to a different branch (using the '-- onto' option).
HTH,
-mandeep
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 08:19:35AM -0800, Mandeep Sandhu wrote:
As others have pointed out, you need 'git rebase' here. With an
interactive rebase, you can cherry-pick what you want to do with each
commit (keep, edit, squash etc). It can also help you apply your
changes to a different branch
git rebase -i master on development is your friend.
On Fri Dec 12 2014 at 9:59:27 AM Kumar Amit Mehta gmate.a...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I know that it's not a typical Linux kernel related query but I reckon
that people involved in Linux kernel testing/development might have
gotten into
How does one send this kind of summary email? Is it generated manually
or through some git format-patch/send-email foo magic?
I have 4 patches that I have to submit. I'd like to send a summary
email (0/4) explaining the changes.
Thanks,
-mandeep
___
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 02:05:50PM -0800, Mandeep Sandhu wrote:
How does one send this kind of summary email? Is it generated manually
or through some git format-patch/send-email foo magic?
I have 4 patches that I have to submit. I'd like to send a summary
email (0/4) explaining the changes.
Thanks Greg!
One more thing. Should the 'Tested-by:' tag be added in every commit
manually, or only one of them is enough (the last patch really
implements the functionality and the rest are 'preparatory' commits)?
-mandeep
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote:
On
On 10-Dec-2014, at 10:18 pm, PRAJAPATI MEHUL mehulprajapati2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
-I am currently working on one embedded development board.
-I have ported 3.0.31 kernel with my personal patches on it.
-When I am trying to insert my module, it fails to allocate 4MB memory using
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 02:29:22PM -0800, Mandeep Sandhu wrote:
Thanks Greg!
One more thing. Should the 'Tested-by:' tag be added in every commit
manually, or only one of them is enough (the last patch really
implements the functionality and the rest are 'preparatory' commits)?
Tested-by is
On 13-Dec-2014 2:27 AM, PRAJAPATI MEHUL mehulprajapati2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
-I am currently working on one embedded development board.
-I have ported 3.0.31 kernel with my personal patches on it.
-When I am trying to insert my module, it fails to allocate 4MB memory
using kmalloc.
10 matches
Mail list logo