On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 4:29 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 03:42:50 +0530, noyb noybee said:
You missed the point. How does the process *securely* get the passphrase
that will be passed into the syscall? (Hint - a keystroke logger is only
the *start* of your
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 3:42 PM, s.rawat imsaurabhra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I recently built the 3.18.5 kernel according to instruction on the
linuxkernel newbie page .I used /sbin/installkernel script to install the
modules and updated the grub.cnf.
On a reboot i get option
Hello,
I recently built the 3.18.5 kernel according to instruction on the
linuxkernel newbie page .I used /sbin/installkernel script to install the
modules and updated the grub.cnf.
On a reboot i get option 3.18.5[b]-custom[/b] and booted in.But now since I
am modifying the kernel and needed
On 11-Feb-2015, at 11:18 pm, VinÃcius Tinti viniciusti...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 3:42 PM, s.rawat imsaurabhra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I recently built the 3.18.5 kernel according to instruction on the
linuxkernel newbie page .I used /sbin/installkernel script to install
Is it true that _every_ PCI or PCI Express device supporting MSI is
indicated by some mention of MSI in lspci -v, and if there's no such
mention, it surely doesn't support MSI?
--
Andrey Utkin
___
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Hello Valdis
Sorry for such a late reply and thank you for such a quick reply.
On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 12:12 -0500, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:45:30 +0800, Brock York said:
(Note, I don't have an Acer, nor am I an HID expert... so take this
all with a grain of
Hi Tsahee,
Am 09.02.2015 um 09:22 schrieb Tsahee Zidenberg:
syscon regmap is one possible way to access a register file from two
different drivers without mapping it twice. But in that case you loose
the name-per-register in devicetree. The devtree maps the general
regfile, and the drivers
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 2:07 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:31:45 +0530, noyb noybee said:
I was planning that the calling process would call the new system call
which would return a pseudo-random key that is used as the
pass-phrase.
So what prevents malicious
Thanks Arun for the link. This clears up things for me.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Arun KS getaru...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Roshan,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Roshan A roshan@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,
My question is regarding the correct use of workqueues. I have a
driver
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:31:45 +0530, noyb noybee said:
I was planning that the calling process would call the new system call
which would return a pseudo-random key that is used as the
pass-phrase.
So what prevents malicious code from doing a fork and then calling the
new syscall to get its
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 03:19:46 +0530, noyb noybee said:
Well, any program which has root credentials is still allowed to call
chroot(it needs to get a new passphrase before) but not any program
with root credentials can exit it.
Well see... now you have a problem.
If you don't allow that
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 04:48:44PM +0530, s.rawat wrote:
thanks for the hint.A quick grep of hid-custom* or custom* inside
Documentation
/hid as well as drivers/iio/ doesn't yields anything related to hid custom
sensor driver.Manual search inside the folders recursively also give the same
thanks for the hint.A quick grep of hid-custom* or custom* inside
Documentation/hid as well as drivers/iio/ doesn't yields anything related
to hid custom sensor driver.Manual search inside the folders recursively
also give the same result.I did this for kernel 3.18.x and 3.19.x.I
inspired to find
Hi,
I have few laptops and two routers with dual band (TP-LINK TL-WDR3600 N600
WIRELESS DUAL BAND GIGABIT ROUTER) .
What i am trying to achieve is if someone want to send msg to a an
individual then one of the band should be used (eg 2.4GHz) and if someone
want to send message to the group then
Hello Roshan,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Roshan A roshan@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,
My question is regarding the correct use of workqueues. I have a
driver which queues a work item in the interrupt handler. The bottom
half function ( the workitem -function ) does have proper locking
Yes the headers are there in the sources of 3.18.5 kernel.But then I have
to change all the references to linux/header_files.h in my modules to the
path of kernel_source/include/linux/header_files.h.This could be
corrective action.I am looking for preventive action .
CONFIG_LOCALVERSION appends
16 matches
Mail list logo
